lightrush 1 day ago • 100%
What do you buy?
lightrush 1 day ago • 100%
I think I found the source of the liquid @abcdqfr@lemmy.world. The thermal pad under the VRM heatsink has begun to liquefy into oily substance. This substance appears to have gone to the underside of the board through the vias around the VRM and discolored itself.
Some rubbing with isopropyl alcohol and it's almost gone:
Perhaps there's still life left in this board if used with an older chip.
lightrush 1 day ago • 100%
I think the board has reached the end of the road. 😅
lightrush 1 day ago • 95%
Hard to say. She's been in 24/7 service since 2017. Never had stability issues and I've tested it with Prime95 plenty of times upon upgrades. Last week I ran a Llama model and the computer froze hard. Even holding the power button wouldn't turn it off. Did the PSU power flip, came back up. Prime95 stable. Llama -> rip. Perhaps it's been cooked for a while and only trips by this workload. She's an old board, a Gigabyte with B350 running a 5950X, so it's not super surprising that the power section has been a bit overused. 😅 Replacing with an X570 as we speak.
lightrush 1 day ago • 100%
Funny enough, I can't detect the smell from hell. Could be COVID.
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
Iiinteresting. I'm on the larger AB350-Gaming 3 and it's got REV: 1.0 printed on it. No problems with the 5950X so far. 🤐 Either sheer luck or there could have been updated units before they officially changed the rev marking.
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
I am slightly offended by other people believing in God but I generally keep it to myself. 😂
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
On paper it should support it. I'm assuming it's the ASRock AB350M. With a certain BIOS version of course. What's wrong with it?
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
B350 isn’t a very fast chipset to begin with
For sure.
I’m willing to bet the CPU in such a motherboard isn’t exactly current-gen either.
Reasonable bet, but it's a Ryzen 9 5950X with 64GB of RAM. I'm pretty proud of how far I've managed to stretch this board. 😆 At this point I'm waiting for blown caps, but the case temp is pretty low so it may end up trucking along for surprisingly long time.
Are you sure you’re even running at PCIe 3.0 speeds too?
So given the CPU, it should be PCIe 3.0, but that doesn't remove any of the queues/scheduling suspicions for the chipset.
I'm now replicating data out of this pool and the read load looks perfectly balanced. Bandwidth's fine too. I think I have no choice but to benchmark the disks individually outside of ZFS once I'm done with this operation in order to figure out whether any show problems. If not, they'll go in the spares bin.
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
Lazy but wholesome.
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
I put the low IOPS disk in a good USB 3 enclosure, hooked to an on-CPU USB controller. Now things are flipped:
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
------------------------------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
storage-volume-backup 12.6T 3.74T 0 563 0 293M
mirror-0 12.6T 3.74T 0 563 0 293M
wwn-0x5000c500e8736faf - - 0 406 0 146M
wwn-0x5000c500e8737337 - - 0 156 0 146M
You might be right about the link problem.
Looking at the B350 diagram, the whole chipset is hooked via PCIe 3.0 x4 link to the CPU. The other pool (the source) is hooked via USB controller on the chipset. The SATA controller is also on the chipset so it also shares the chipset-CPU link. I'm pretty sure I'm also using all the PCIe links the chipset provides for SSDs. So that's 4GB/s total for the whole chipset. Now I'm probably not saturating the whole link, in this particular workload, but perhaps there's might be another related bottleneck.
lightrush 1 week ago • 100%
Turns out the on-CPU SATA controller isn't available when the NVMe slot is used. 🫢 Swapped SATA ports, no diff. Put the low IOPS disk in a good USB 3 enclosure, hooked to an on-CPU USB controller. Now things are flipped:
capacity operations bandwidth
pool alloc free read write read write
------------------------------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
storage-volume-backup 12.6T 3.74T 0 563 0 293M
mirror-0 12.6T 3.74T 0 563 0 293M
wwn-0x5000c500e8736faf - - 0 406 0 146M
wwn-0x5000c500e8737337 - - 0 156 0 146M
lightrush 2 weeks ago • 100%
Interesting. SMART looks pristine on both drives. Brand new drives - Exos X22. Doesn't mean there isn't an impending problem of course. I might try shuffling the links to see if that changes the behaviour on the suggestions of the other comment. Both are currently hooked to an AMD B350 chipset SATA controller. There are two ports that should be hooked to the on-CPU SATA controller. I imagine the two SATA controllers don't share bandwidth. I'll try putting one disk on the on-CPU controller.
lightrush 2 weeks ago • 100%
Goddamn. This is significant.
lightrush 2 weeks ago • 100%
Wait, that's a Canadian entity, interesting.
I'm syncoiding from my normal RAIDz2 to a backup mirror made of 2 disks. I looked at `zpool iostat` and I noticed that one of the disks consistently shows less than half the write IOPS of the other: ``` capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ------------------------------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- storage-volume-backup 5.03T 11.3T 0 867 0 330M mirror-0 5.03T 11.3T 0 867 0 330M wwn-0x5000c500e8736faf - - 0 212 0 164M wwn-0x5000c500e8737337 - - 0 654 0 165M ``` This is also evident in `iostat`: ``` f/s f_await aqu-sz %util Device 0.00 0.00 3.48 46.2% sda 0.00 0.00 8.10 99.7% sdb ``` The difference is also evident in the temperatures of the disks. The busier disk is 4 degrees warmer than the other. The disks are identical on paper and bought at the same time. Is this behaviour expected?
lightrush 2 months ago • 100%
Don't let be called a hypocrite - give $5. 😆
lightrush 2 months ago • 100%
Subscribed monthly.
lightrush 2 months ago • 100%
Goddamn.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
- Lenovo ThinkCentre / Dell OptiPlex USFF machine like the M710q.
- Secondary NVMe or SATA SSD for a RAID1 mirror
- Use LVMRAID for this. It uses mdraid underneath but it's easier to manage
- External USB disks for storage
- WD Elements generally work well when well ventilated
- OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad has a very well implemented USB path and has been problem-free in my testing
- Debian / Ubuntu LTS
- ZFS for the disk storage
- Backups may require a second copy or similar of this setup so keep that in mind when thinking about the storage space and cost
Here's a visual inspiration:
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Sadly no.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
You should see the microwave.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Yes, yes I would use ZFS if I had only one file on my disk.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
OK, I think it may have to do with the odd number of data drives. If I create a raidz2 with 4 of the 5 disks, even with ashift=12
, recordsize=128K
, the performance in sequential single thread read is stellar. What's not clear is why this doesn't affect, or not as much, the 4x 8TB-drive raidz1.
I built a 5x 16TB RAIDz2, filled it with data, then I discovered the following. Sequentially reading a single file from the file system gave me around 40MB/s. Reading multiple in parallel brought the total throughput in the hundreds of megabytes - where I'd expect it. This is really weird. The 5 disks show 100% utilization during single file reads. Writes are supremely fast, whether single threaded or parallel. Reading directly from each disk gives >200MB/s. Splitting the the RAIDz2 into two RAIDz1s, or into one RAIDz1 and a mirror improved reads to 100 and something MB/s. Better but still not where it should be. I have an existing RAIDz1 made of 4x 8TB disks on the same machine. That one reads with 250-350MB/s. I made an equivalent 4x 16TB RAIDz1 from the new drives and that read with about 100MB/s. Much slower. All of this was done with `ashift=12` and default `recordsize`. The disks' datasheets say their block size is 4096. I decided to try RAIDz2 with `ashift=13` even though the disks really say they've got 4K physical block size. Lo and behold, the single file reads went to over 150MB/s. 🤔 Following from there, I got full throughput when I increased the `recordsize` to 1M. This produces full throughput even with `ashift=12`. My existing 4x 8TB RAIDz1 pools with `ashift=12` and `recordsize=128K` read single files *fast.* Here's a diff of the queue dump of the old and new drives. The left side is a WD 8TB from the existing RAIDz1, the right side is one of the new HC550 16TB ``` < max_hw_sectors_kb: 1024 --- > max_hw_sectors_kb: 512 20c20 < max_sectors_kb: 1024 --- > max_sectors_kb: 512 25c25 < nr_requests: 2 --- > nr_requests: 60 36c36 < write_cache: write through --- > write_cache: write back 38c38 < write_zeroes_max_bytes: 0 --- > write_zeroes_max_bytes: 33550336 ``` Could the `max_*_sectors_kb` being half on the new drives have something to do with it? --- Can anyone make any sense of any of this?
I wasn't aware Steve Paikin and John McGrath had a podcast on Ontario politics. I like it!
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Found the bit counter
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
I think I've seen this hypothesis too and it makes sense to me.
If I'm building a new AMD system today, I'd look for a board that exposes more of the chipset-provided USB ports. Otherwise I'd budget for a high quality 4-port PCIe USB controller, if I'm planning to rely a lot on USB on that system.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
This article provides some context. Now I do have the latest firmware which should have these fixes but they don't seem to be foolproof. I've seen reports around the web that the firmware improves things but doesn't completely eliminate them.
If you've seen devices disconnecting and reconnecting on occasion, it could be it.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
I've been on the USB train since 2019.
You're exactly right, you gotta get devices with good USB-to-SATA chipsets, and you gotta keep them cool.
I've been using a mix of WD Elements, WD MyBook and StarTech/Vantec enclosures (ASM1351). I've had to cool all the chipsets on WD because they like bolt the PCBs straight to the drive so it heats up from it.
From all my testing I've discovered that:
- ASM1351 and ASM235CM are generally problem-free, but the former needs passive cooling if close to a disk. A small heatsink adhered with standard double-sided heat conductive tape is good enough.
- Host controllers matter too. Intel is generally problem-free. So is VIA. AMD has some issues on the CPU side on some models which are still not fully solved.
I like this box in particular because it uses a very straightforward design. It's got 4x ASM235CM with cooling connected to a VIA hub. It's got a built-in power supply, fan, it even comes with good cables. It fixes a lot of the system variables to known good values. You're left with connecting it to a good USB host controller.
WD PCB on disk
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
You want ASMedia ASM1351 (heatsinked) or ASM235CM on the device side 🥹
This box has 4x ASM235CM and from the testing I've conducted over the last week it seems rock solid, so long as it's not connected to the Ryzen's built-in USB controller. It's been flawless on the B350 chipset's USB controller.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Thanks for the warning ⚠️🙏
This isn't my first rodeo with ZFS on USB. I've been running USB for a few years now. Recently I ran this particular box through a battery of tests and I'm reasonably confident that with my particular set of hardware it'll be fine. It passed everything I threw at it, once connected to a good port on my machine. But you're generally right and as you can see I discussed that in the testing thread, and I encountered some issues that I managed to solve. If you think I've missed something specific - let me know! 😊
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
That was the cheapest option. 🤭
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Two machines. A main server/workstation and a small off-site backup machine that runs the same services but hass less compute and RAM.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
- 8x 8TB in a set of 2, some shucked WDs, some IronWolfs
- 5x 16TB in a set of 2, "recertified" WDs from serverpartdeals.com
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
Multilayer recording sounds like it would require read-rewrite similar to how SMR works. Still perhaps we'd be okay with that for the dramatic capacity increase.
lightrush 5 months ago • 100%
And now it no longer shows up.
lightrush 6 months ago • 100%
Quite possibly. That said the one I linked is CUI, not a noname. It's even got an MTBF of 300K hours in its datasheet. There are cheaper ones. 😅 And more expensive ones.
lightrush 6 months ago • 83%
It can't because birds are not real.
lightrush 6 months ago • 100%
I see a number of dual-output PSUs on Mouser that will probably fit well if this goes. For example.
lightrush 6 months ago • 100%
Yeah, I googled that IC, no hits. 😂
lightrush 6 months ago • 100%
git merge --no-ff
## Why I'm running a ZFS pool of 4 external USB drives. It's a mix of WD Elements and enclosed IronWolfs. I'm looking to consolidate it into a single box since I'm likely to add another 4 drives to it in the near future and dealing with 8 external drives could become a bit problematic in a few ways. ## ZFS with USB drives There's been recurrent questions about ZFS with USB. Does it work? How does it work? Is it recommended and so on. The answer is complicated but it revolves around - yes it works and it can work well **so long as you ensure that anything on your USB path is good.** And that's difficult since it's not generally known what USB-SATA bridge chipset an external USB drive has, whether it's got firmware bugs, whether it requires quirks, is it stable under sustained load etc. Then that difficulty is multiplied by the number of drives the system has. In my setup for example, I've swapped multiple enclosure models till I stumbled on a rock-solid one. I've also had to install heatsinks on the ASM1351 USB-SATA bridge ICs in the WD Elements drives to stop them from overheating and dropping dead under heavy load. With this in mind, if a multi-bay unit like the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad proves to be as reliable as some anecdotes say, it could become a go-to recommendation for USB DAS that eliminates a lot of those variables, leaving just the host side since it comes with a cable too. And the host side tends to be reliable since it's typically either Intel or AMD. Read ##Testing for some tidbits about AMD. ## Initial observations of the OWC Mercury Elite Pro Quad - Built like a tank, heavy enclosure, feet screwed-in not glued - Well designed for airflow. Air enters the front, goes through the disks, PSU, main PCB and exits from the back. Some IronWolf that averaged 55°C in individual enclosures clock at 43°C in here - It's got a Good Quality DC Fan (check pics). So far it's pretty quiet - Uses 4x ASM235CM USB-SATA bridge ICs which are found in other well-regarded USB enclosures. It's newer than the ASM1351 which is also reliable when not overheating - The USB-SATA bridges are wired to a USB 3.1 Gen 2 hub - VLI-822. No SATA port multipliers - The USB hub is heatsinked - The ASM235CM ICs have a weird thick thermal pad attached to them but without any metal attached to it. It appears they're serving as heatsinks themselves which might be enough for the ICs to stay within working temps - The main PCB is all-solid-cap affair - The PSU shows electrolytic caps which is unsurprising - The main PCB is connected to the PSU via standard molex connectors like the ones found in ATX PSUs. Therefore if the built-in PSU dies, it could be replaced with an ATX PSU - It appears to rename the drives to its own "Elite Pro Quad A/B/C/D" naming, however `hdparm -I /dev/sda` seems to return the original drive information. The disks appear with their internal designations in GNOME Disks. The kernel maps them in `/dev/disks/by-id/*` according to those as before. I moved my drives in it, rebooted and ZFS started the pool as if nothing happened - SMART info is visible in GNOME Disks as well as `smartctl -x /dev/sda` - It comes with both USB-C to USB-C cable and USB-C to USB A - Made in Taiwan ## Testing - No errors in the system logs so far - I'm able to pull 350-370MB/s sequential from my 4-disk RAIDz1 - Loading the 4 disks together with `hdparm` results in about 400MB/s total bandwidth - It's hooked up via USB 3.1 Gen 1 on a B350 motherboard. I don't see a significant difference in the observed speeds whether it's on the chipset-provided USB host, or the CPU-provided one - Completed a manual scrub of a 24TB RAIDz1 while also being loaded with an Immich backup, Plex usage, Syncthing rescans and some other services. No errors in the system log. Drives stayed under 44°C. Stability looks promising - Will pull a drive and add a new one to resilver once the latest changes get to the off-site backup - Pulled a drive from the pool and replaced it with a spare while the pool was live. SATA hot plugging seems to work. Resilvered 5.25TB in about 32 hours while the pool was in use. Found the following vomit in the logs repeating every few minutes: ``` Apr 01 00:31:08 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 01 00:31:08 host kernel: usb 6-3.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd Apr 01 00:31:08 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success Apr 01 00:32:42 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 01 00:32:42 host kernel: usb 6-3.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd Apr 01 00:32:42 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success Apr 01 00:33:54 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 01 00:33:54 host kernel: usb 6-3.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd Apr 01 00:33:54 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success Apr 01 00:35:07 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 01 00:35:07 host kernel: usb 6-3.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd Apr 01 00:35:07 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success Apr 01 00:36:38 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 01 00:36:38 host kernel: usb 6-3.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 12 using xhci_hcd Apr 01 00:36:38 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success ``` It appears to be only related to the drive being resilvered. I did not observe resilver errors - Resilvering `iostat` shows numbers in-line with the 500MB/s of the the USB 3.1 Gen 1 port it's connected to: ``` tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd Device 314.60 119.9M 95.2k 0.0k 599.4M 476.0k 0.0k sda 264.00 119.2M 92.0k 0.0k 595.9M 460.0k 0.0k sdb 411.00 119.9M 96.0k 0.0k 599.7M 480.0k 0.0k sdc 459.40 0.0k 120.0M 0.0k 0.0k 600.0M 0.0k sdd ``` - Running a second resilver on a chipset-provided USB 3.1 port while looking for USB resets like previously seen in the logs. The hypothesis is that here's instability with the CPU-provided USB 3.1 ports as there have been documented problems with those * I had the new drive disconnect upon KVM switch, where the KVM is connected to the same same chipset-provided USB controller. Moved the KVM to the CPU-provided controller. This is getting fun * Got the same resets as the drive began the sequential write phase: ``` Apr 02 16:13:47 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler start Apr 02 16:13:47 host kernel: usb 6-2.4: reset SuperSpeed USB device number 9 using xhci_hcd Apr 02 16:13:47 host kernel: scsi host11: uas_eh_device_reset_handler success ``` * 🤦 It appears that I read the manual wrong. All the 3.1 Gen 1 ports on the back IO are CPU-provided. Moving to a chipset-provided port for real and retesting... The resilver entered its sequential write phase and there's been no resets so far. The peak speeds are a tad higher too: ``` tps kB_read/s kB_wrtn/s kB_dscd/s kB_read kB_wrtn kB_dscd Device 281.80 130.7M 63.2k 0.0k 653.6M 316.0k 0.0k sda 273.00 130.1M 56.8k 0.0k 650.7M 284.0k 0.0k sdb 353.60 130.8M 63.2k 0.0k 654.0M 316.0k 0.0k sdc 546.00 0.0k 133.2M 0.0k 0.0k 665.8M 0.0k sdd ``` * Resilver finished. No resets or errors in the system logs * Did a second resilver. Finished without errors again * Resilver while connected to the chipset-provided USB port takes around 18 hours for the same disk that took over 30 hours via the CPU-provided port ## Verdict so far ~~The OWC passed all of the testing so far with flying colors.~~ Even though resilver finished successfully, there were silent USB resets in the logs with the OWC connected to CPU-provided ports. Multiple ports exhibited the same behavior. When connected to a B350 chipset-provided port on the other hand the OWC finished two resilvers with no resets and faster, 18 hours vs 32 hours. My hypothesis is that these silent resers are likely related to the known USB problems with Ryzen CPUs. The OWC itself passed testing with flying colors when connected to a chipset port. I'm buying another one for the new disks. ## Pics ### General ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/db5dbebe-13e9-40a5-835f-9b39cd0911af.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/f69ab275-1be5-4bc2-b0bd-9cd3ae092a6d.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/cad3e2fc-09ce-4c3f-8570-9140152c0c60.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/4279b793-83d3-456d-a430-d54475390239.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/25a2d1bc-6dd8-4682-92ed-846f8e718906.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/d044f0eb-33b5-4299-8232-b960e98a5438.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/64d17833-5a95-4848-858f-963b410dc766.jpeg) ### PSU ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/ea771b59-27b4-43bc-a572-6f54f8e3737c.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/c651469b-1851-422d-b0be-013b23e7bd2d.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/48c6dbdf-8571-4465-8e6c-f7a4d77cfb81.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/8dc16b83-317e-459a-b59c-a33f17006aa1.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/190d1391-b372-4231-bf64-6e404c2c2a08.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/575564f0-b225-448d-ba30-eb324d5e1273.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/f6cdb3cd-23c1-4297-88eb-28e759efd484.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/00382605-e11c-43a2-8dd9-02334000387a.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/9a167fa5-eda2-4b8a-8777-471f0a5daa05.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/e7149bc2-684e-44d6-8384-80e8b0aaca41.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/a1a8d38e-a451-4376-8407-ecc0800b2b8c.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/797e745b-1683-47b2-bf37-7db944119db8.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/08af9fc9-6482-4664-84f7-a20c9df6c9e4.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/cb17adcd-b18b-4fc3-bba7-10476dd20d42.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/5257a9b3-9c1a-4c10-b9f3-18b0b0184892.jpeg)
Swapped out the stock Gateron Brown switches for MX2A Ergo Clear. Added o-rings to shorten the key travel to 2.5-3mm. The result feels dramatically different. Individual key presses feel amazing. I'm not sure about typing yet.
It's a very interesting feel, unlike any other mechanical keyboard I've had. I've been typing on DSA for over half a decade now so I'm used to the flat row profile but the increased surface size still messes with my brain bit. I like it. There's some similarity to the feel of a laptop keyboard. More info on [SP G20.](https://spkeyboards.com/pages/g20-keycap-sets)
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/245cbb54-5920-43a9-8c0a-312c0cbfc5ca.png) > Here we go. The setup was pretty trivial. The setup for the Zooz GPIO Z-Wave adapter for Yellow was trivial. Adding the T6 was trivial too. I had to install 2x Z-Wave smart plugs to extend the network from where the Yellow is to where the thermostat is. I used Leviton Z-Wave smart plugs. Finally I added the automation I wanted this whole thing for. Seems to work ™ > > The only downside I can see so far is that the T6 doesn’t support multi-speed fan (G1/G2/G3 wiring) so I had to choose one of the speeds while wiring and I can’t use the rest. From what I can tell Ecobee seems to be able to use G1/2/3 but I’m not ready to give up on the ethernet-independent operation T6 and Z-Wave allow to have multiple fan speeds. > > Does anyone know if there’s a (non-retail) variant of the T6 that supports multi-speed fan? I needed some thermostat automation done and I stumbled upon [this thread.](https://community.home-assistant.io/t/which-thermostat-is-most-home-assistant-friendly-ecobee/632022) I just attempted this and it went about as smoothly as I can imagine. If you're also in need of an offline solution, the Z-Wave version of the Honeywell T6 seems to do the job. #homeassistant #zwave #thermostat #homeautomation
> Waste sitting in pits could fill almost 883,000 Olympic-size swimming pools, and oil companies say they need to find a way to reduce it > The companies, including an affiliate of Exxon Mobil, are lobbying the Canadian government to set rules that would allow them to treat the waste and release it into the Athabasca River by 2025, so they have enough time to meet their commitments to eventually close the mines. Of course they are.
> An early experiment suggests that an injection of klotho improves working memory.
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/1034471 > I have a bit of data that has to be encrypted and stored into a file so that it can be moved across file systems and possibly OSes. Disk encryption like dm-crypt and a loop device isn't appropriate as it may not exist on another OS. > > It's been a very long time since I needed this sort of software. More than a decade ago I used TrueCrypt. I know that VeraCrypt is the current re-incarnationn of the project. Is that still the go-to software for this sort of application? Is there something else that's popular these days?
I have a bit of data that has to be encrypted and stored into a file so that it can be moved across file systems and possibly OSes. Disk encryption like dm-crypt and a loop device isn't appropriate as it may not exist on another OS. It's been a very long time since I needed this sort of software. More than a decade ago I used TrueCrypt. I know that VeraCrypt is the current re-incarnationn of the project. Is that still the go-to software for this sort of application? Is there something else that's popular these days?
> TekSavvy is **the last remaining large internet wholesale provider,** as others have been snapped up by bigger rivals in what independent ISPs describe as a challenging regulatory environment. > Roughly half a dozen independent ISPs have been sold since February of 2022. According to BMO Capital Markets analyst Tim Casey, BCE Inc. paid roughly $139-million for Ebox, an internet, telephone and television service provider based in Longueuil, Que., and approximately $335-million for Ottawa-based Distributel last year. > Telus, meanwhile, acquired Altima Telecom and Start.ca for undisclosed amounts, while Quebecor Inc. snapped up VMedia, an independent internet and television provider serving customers primarily in Toronto, in July of 2022. The price of the VMedia acquisition was also not disclosed. > Montreal-based Cogeco Inc., meanwhile, paid $100-million for Oxio, a Montreal-based provider with 48,000 internet subscribers, Mr. Casey wrote in a research note.. 🤦🤦♀️🤦🏼♂️ Sent an email to my MP. This is a competition issue similar to the Shaw sale to Rogers and the feds should get involved. You should do the same.
So far I'm liking this Quebecor acquisition. 🥲 #FreedomMobile
> "I've always said I'm staying out of the race and I have the right, like anyone else, to put a sign on my lawn," Ford said at an announcement in Ottawa for funding to further train electricians. Nice job staying out of the race! 👌
> Some investors are attracted to covered call funds because of their high income yields and seemingly high risk-adjusted returns. However, the appearance of high income and high risk-adjusted returns is the result of clever financial product design, not of actual improvements to returns or risk-adjusted returns. Let's inaugurate this community with a new video by The Ben Felix. 🥲
This occurred today when trying to cast from YouTube to my Chromecast w/ Google TV (CCwGTV). The CCwGTV doesn't have any updates available and neither do the YouTube apps on the phone or the CCwGTV. Has anyone seen it? Any solution?
## Solution Using an open drain buffer like the `74LVC1G07` did the trick. Note that this part only works for inputs with a pull-up resistor. There are other parts from the same lineup that can work with any input. ## Problem > I have an ebike computer that has two inputs that accept square wave signals. The range is 0-5V. One of the inputs has no pull-up/down resistors on it. When I hook up a device producing signal, the signal is detected correctly. Both highs and lows are detected correctly. The other input has a built-in pull-up resistor. When I hook the same signal to it, only the high side is detected. Measuring the voltage of the low side, it's a bit higher than when hooked to the other input and I'm guessing it isn't crossing the low threshold the computer expects in order to register the low. > Am I right in thinking that the pull-up resistor is increasing the lows? > Is it possible to counteract the internal pull-up resistor by hooking a pull-down resistor to the input? > I'm a software guy with decent soldering skills and minimal knowledge in electronics so please answer like I'm not the brightest electronic bulb on the tree. > Thank you in advance! Cross-posting my question from StackExchange.
> Knowledge silos and expertise are two sides of the same coin. From full stack engineering to DevOps practitioner, our industry loves to pretend everyone can do everything. We’re an industry of hobbyists. We love to tinker. I don’t know if we are fooling ourselves or if the industry has been exploiting our hobby-driven nature, but it’s time for DevOps to get thrown out of an airlock.
Track list 1. For The People 05:18 2. Ta 06:12 3. Kazan 08:58 4. Vacation 05:22
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/1236714 > **What's Changed** > > * QoL: Allow debug version installed next to release version by @MV-GH in #501 > * Added Italian localization by @andreaippo in #533 > * Highlight the current screen in BottomAppBar by @ironveil in #531 > * Fix stale user profile data showing momentarily on PersonProfileActivity during fetch operations by @a1studmuffin in #518 > * Prevent multiple line entry for the name of an instance on login. by @camporter in #520 > * Add Brazilian Portuguese localization by @somehare in #540 > * Fix big font size cutting off settings options by @calincara in #534 > * Hide downvote button on comments and posts when disabled by @lsim in #502 > * Added default community icon where appropriate by @a1studmuffin in #549 > * Add a user agent by @camporter in #519 > * If login fails, don't leave the current lemmy instance invalid by @camporter in #521 > * Fix some issues with the unread counts not being accurate by @camporter in #537 > * Fix the missing 'Old' default sort account setting. by @camporter in #517 > * Added "Go to (user)" option in more places by @a1studmuffin in #515 > * Update AndroidManifest.xml to match instances added in #505 by @shombando in #552 > * Add contentDescription to all relevant components by @pipe01 in #470 > * Added Swedish localisation by @JasBC in #569 > * Fix typos in German strings by @tribut in #564 > * #345 respect avatar settings by @igarshep in #554 > * Increased NSFW blur by @XanderV2001 in #576 > * Localization of user tabs by @kuroi-usagi in #563 > * Add communities list to sidebar, fixes #510 by @twizmwazin in #512 > * feat/launcher icon by @seamuslowry in #528 > * Bash isn't portable, use POSIX sh instead by @7heo in #560 > * Implement animated gifs when clicking on an image by @beatgammit in #580 > * Add strings.xml for locale ko by @meinside in #586 > * Copy paste bugfix for bottom bar highlight by @a1studmuffin in #592 > * Swedish localisation revised; strings.xml-file fixed. by @JasBC in #594 > * Images updated 2 by @dessalines in #595 > * Comment action bar fixes by @a1studmuffin in #593 > * Remove unnecessary check by @7heo in #600 > * Show default icon for community links in sidebar by @a1studmuffin in #590 > * Update Italian Translations by @andscape-dev in #591 > * Revamped BottomBar to match MD3 by @ironveil in #567 >
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/76cacdb0-3bc3-49ee-8e35-42c0bb31695b.mp4) Meanwhile, everyone turning right has to enter the middle lane to turn right. The vid was taken during a gap in the traffic so that the whole scene is visible. Outside of that brief window it didn't look this peaceful. If you're wondering how you could take minutes to do this, that wasn't the final location. This was: ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/d09d1631-7a51-4f94-b2cc-ade91f542aa8.jpeg)
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/629220 > 👀
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/8d814a92-e5d3-47f0-8933-b7a94827c129.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/5cf124f9-55b7-474a-a606-4edd7066df71.jpeg) ![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/38b89a02-10b8-46c5-a657-776677c7ba71.jpeg) M715q / Ryzen 2400GE / 16GB / 500GB / 4x WD 8T / Ubuntu LTS / ZFS RAIDZ1 / fire-resistant case up to 230°C
Chipolo was mentioned in the Find My Device presentation during IO 23. Looking into them I found that they're based in Slovenia. That puts them firmly under EU privacy and general regulation. If you're in the market for such a device, this might not be a bad option. I'm currently using Tile but I pre-ordered Chipolo to try.
A great read on what's happening to the social platforms around us.
cross-posted from: https://feddit.de/post/764148 > From the video description: > > "We interviewed one of Noctua's technical team members (Jakob Dellinger) to discuss the challenges and troubles of focusing entirely on performance for a cooling product. This video goes over fan behaviors like tensile strength, endurance, aging, creep, and cooling characteristics like blade tip distance from the frame and blade passing harmonics. The video is a surprisingly transparent insight into what Noctua has been dealing with for 8 years now as it has attempted to reinvent its most popular product, and the company now thinks it has an NH-D15 Gen2 and "Next Gen Fan" nearly ready for primetime."
This works with Chrome. [Knighthawk 0811](https://lemmy.ca/comment/168184) says it works with Firefox as well. 1. Go to your Lemmy instance 2. Open the browser menu 3. Tap on "Install app" 4. Tap "Install" in the dialog 5. Tap on the newly created Lemmy shortcut on your home screen
![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/00c219a8-7c36-4936-8423-883ed94fb318.mp4)