SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Yes this graph makes way more sense. The original graph had no base, age is arbitrary to events over time without a date of birth. So if you were born in 1751 and were 5 years old the original says 11% of all emissions happened in your lifetime. It also say if you were born in 2019 and were 5 years old that 11% of all emissions happened in your lifetime. It has static measurements across time when yearly emissions aren’t static.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
That’s what I don’t get about this. The point is either to get out of paying or at least make it very difficult. At the same time the cost to Disney as a company with all the bad press and fall out from doing this would be orders of magnitude greater than simply paying the widower compensation. Who signed off on it? The idea that a lawyer can do what ever it takes to win a case while simultaneously destroying the company they work for seems dumb as shit from a purely financial point of view.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
What about sideways?
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
It’s more different than better, and by different I mean better
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 66%
Left is in common sense units, right is in intelligence units. There is no “freedom” (to be ignorant) units though no.
Also sorry for the burn but it is a deserving burn at least.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Temperature of the body
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
That’s ridiculous, he’s obviously Jesus Christ.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Snopes says this
What's True Tobacco enemas were a real and at one time popular medical practice thought to have been able to revive people who had drowned or were otherwise catastrophically ill. What's False However, the phrase "blow smoke up your ass" appears to have its origins more recently, in the 1960s, and there is no evidence linking it to the long-ago practice of tobacco enemas.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
He’s making the fossil fuel industry look bad
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 3%
A criminal is basically someone who wronged or oppressed someone else. I wouldn’t consider them vulnerable. Still a shitty way to treat prisoners
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Get peasants to ask the fed? When has the fed ever given a shit about what peasants say
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 50%
Yes but Rittenhouse couldn’t have shot someone unless he felt in fear for his life. This isn’t like a cop putting 20 bullets in someone cause he thought his comb was a gun. He literally had a gun pointed at him. If this didn’t happen he would be a murderer. It did happen and the idiot who did this should share the blame of a stupid situation. It’s like people can’t comprehend there are shades of grey.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Idiot.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
50% of companies say 75% of layoffs weren’t 100% necessary.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Why not throw in some demonic possession while you’re at it
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 37%
He obviously went there looking for trouble. What Rittenhouse did in response to other people’s unlawful actions was deemed lawful by a court. There’s not much more to it besides the cases hyper politicisation. For some reason (riots) it became left vs right. If you remove the politics, it’s just some idiot who knowingly went into a dangerous situation - then some other idiots attacked him, one even had a gun pointed at him, this is worse than Rittenhouse simply carrying a gun. It seemed like a dumb case for the left to get behind - nearly nothing about Rittenhouse’s attackers were discussed in the media. It was solely focused on Rittenhouse and his stupidity. Not what whether or not his attackers also did something wrong. Which they did according to a court.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
How very trump of him
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 93%
When you shit your pants and then you get a whiff
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
No you.
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Weird losers
SuckMyWang 1 month ago • 100%
Elon is acting like a real snowflake
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 50%
So 4% vegan and 4% vegetarian?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
After all the cowardly things he has done, why is this only trending now?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
Good chance he’s full of shit and what really happened was more criminal so he had too come up with an even more batshit story to get himself out of it
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
Isn’t he always talking about dicks?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
He has to demand it because he can’t earn it
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
I knew I should have added the /s
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
No I mean the title implies as though she can restore roe. If she can do it why can’t Biden? Answer is either Biden doesn’t want to or he can’t and it will be the same for Kamala
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
My point is that if you look at countries with Muslim majority or sharia law, human rights are far more often than in non Muslim countries not respected. If this statement offends you, you are part of the problem. This may be difficult to see if it is the status quo but looking from the outside it seems obvious the moral thing to do is let you daughters go to school, be free from fear of “honour” killings, allow people to be who they want to be without fear of being thrown off a building and the list goes on.
I am under no illusions that imperialist countries have many problems but when it comes to human rights they have progressed beyond the Stone Age.
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
No. If you read the thread this is in reference to people who attempt to tie their own race with religion. Eg Jewish people who believe an anti Zionist statement is anti Jewish or a criticism of parts of the Koran is somehow an attack on Arab people
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
And with right to try now there is?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
I’m unfamiliar with the details of these programs. I thought the point of right to try was if you were going to die anyway, being allowed to try an experimental treatment as long as you had exhausted all other options where as the existing program (assuming EAP) still prevented people accessing some experimental treatments?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 94%
I thought this was a good thing trump did
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 91%
It’s a lie. Just like being anti Zionist is racist. It’s not. Can happily critisize problematic teachings of religious doctrines while having zero problems with a person of that race who also disagrees with the doctrine.
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
Do they send 78 year old people to prison?
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
Stop a kid from harming himself by, punching him in the face. Worth a try
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 100%
Who thinks like this? And why? Tbh I don’t really care why
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 33%
The problem is crashing the economy will kill a lot of people right now, no need to wait or come up with a better solution
SuckMyWang 2 months ago • 57%
Doing it as fast as possible would crash the world economy because everything is setup up for oil. So it seems obvious what needs to happen, it’s a different story when you personally are now homeless and you just want a roof and food. We can do a lot better than we are though
Not the exact wording but the general premise behind it is a fair counter point in any disagreement. When someone is attempting to gain a higher moral authority, bringing up any hypocrisy is a reasonable thing to do. If pointing out hypocrisy is then dismissed, it is reasonable to assume the other person is not arguing in good faith and therefore should no be taken seriously.