mrh 5 months ago • 100%
I understand the general job market, but what about lisp prevents you from pursuing personal ventures with it?
mrh 5 months ago • 100%
Yeah Clojure is like the monkey's paw of Lisp weenies. It adds many modern day niceties that are lacking in standard Scheme or Common Lisp, but also changes enough things to make it feel very un-lispy. I go back and forth as to whether or not I even consider it Lisp (Richard Stallman doesn't).
But I do know that I'd rather write Clojure than any other non-lisp language.
I'd also recommend people try ABCL, which is Common Lisp on the JVM , or Parenscript which is Common Lisp that compiles to Javascript.
mrh 5 months ago • 90%
Lisp
It solves so many problems new languages have been invented to try and solve, while being simultaneously simpler than most
mrh 5 months ago • 81%
Look up what?
mrh 5 months ago • 91%
Source?
mrh 5 months ago • 100%
oh no real controversy, the post just instantly received 2 downvotes and 2 upvotes, and I know some find Monolord drone-y/boring
mrh 5 months ago • 100%
monolord controversy I see 👀
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
emacs org-mode publish
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-publish-html-tutorial.html
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
emacs org-mode meets all of these criteria
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
M-% NixOS RET Guix RET !
But yes 80% of my comment applies to Nix as well, as of course Nix is older and Guix is (conceptually) based on Nix. Though I personally use/prefer Guix.
mrh 7 months ago • 88%
Yes GNU Guix is a linux distro.
The package manager for Guix (also called guix) is also a portable package manager which works on any linux distro, similar to flatpak, nix, homebrew, etc.
Guix's claim to fame is that it is a functional distro/package manager, meaning that all changes are atomic, so installing/upgrading/deleting packages never leaves your system in a broken state.
Not only that, but if you make some change to your system and it breaks for normal reasons (e.g. newest software version has a bug), you can roll back to your previous system state with all your previous packages and their versions, and this roll-back operation is also atomic.
Guix the distro not only let's you do package management this way, but also let's you do declarative system configuration. This means rather than manually rummaging around /etc changing files and hoping nothing breaks, there's simply a single config file which declares all of your system configuration. From your kernel to users, partitions, system services, and just about anything else, all the configuration is declaratively done in one place with one language (Guile Scheme). Any changes you make to your system this way are also of course atomic and can be rolled back.
It even comes with a built in system called guix home which lets you bring that same level of declarative, atomic configuration to your user's home environment, letting you manage user level packages, dotfiles, env variables, and more with a single home configuration file.
There are other goodies too, such as the ability to spawn one-off shell environments with the guix shell command, dropping you in a shell with all the packages and env variables you declare, keeping your regular user environment clean (very nice for development).
There's even more, but at this point if you're still interested just head over to the site and the docs.
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
I hope so! I love hooded menace. I was on the fence as to whether or not people on this sub would like to see death-doom. Maybe someone can make a post at some point gauging the temperature of what people wanna see in a "doom" community.
Or just wiat for people to get mad when someone posts sunbather.
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
codeberg
it’s like github but non-corporate free software
it’s very polished and featurful
it’s built upon/by the same devs as forgejo, which is open tech to self host your own git server (with federation potentially coming), so supporting one supports the other
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
If I understand you correctly, this is trivial in emacs:
(defun insert-text ()
(interactive)
(insert "your text here"))
(global-set-key your-keybind-here #'insert-text)
You could make it a format string if it relies on data specific to some file or parameter. You could also make the keybind local to certain modes/files rather than a global keybind if you don't want to pollute your keybind space.
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
probably my favorite bell witch song (if not counting mirror reaper)
Beware! Here be core influences. But don't worry, I don't like core ifluences, and I like this, therefore it must be good.
mrh 7 months ago • 97%
emacs org-mode
mrh 7 months ago • 100%
Hell yeah I love HoF, one of my favorite bands of all time \m/.
Death is this communion is great, but my favorites are probably either this or their debut The Art of Self Defense.
mrh 8 months ago • 100%
I’ll never understand why we don’t just use s-expressions.
mrh 8 months ago • 100%
guix home reconfigure home-config.scm
mrh 8 months ago • 100%
Thanks!
Do you happen to know what certs would be most "applicable" in this case? Something like OSWE?
mrh 8 months ago • 100%
Any advice on requirements to have a shot at appsec jobs?
I have my sec+ and my job is devops. We do everything in AWS (no on prem at all). However I have no actual cyber experience. Our team is pretty small, so I do as much dev as anyone else and as much ops as anyone else (deploying/managing cloud infrastructure), including standard security stuff like IAM and network configuration. It's also a small unknown company.
Is this enough to try and directly break into appsec, or do I need to start with another "cyber" role like SOC analyst or security engineer or something like that? I also plan on getting my OSCP at some point soon if that's relevant.
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
I think I said something a bit stronger than what I meant. I'm not averse to sharing my thoughts on posts, I've just never held it against a post if the OP happens to not provide some comment containing their thoughts on it.
I do see what you're saying about not knowing what something is, and not wanting to spend ~1 hour on it to find out. Though I still don't think that's what downvoting is for (unless you have positive evidence that it's spam).
Mainly I disagree with "I'll downvote it to make room for the posts that are definitely good". That's just very much not my philosophy and not one I ever took to be a majority view. Downvoting for me means the content is not good/appropriate/whatever. It's a sign of negativity, and being not definitely good != being bad.
mrh 10 months ago • 80%
I appreciate you being the 1/8 to actually state their reason!
Everything seemed pretty self-explanatory to me in a community like this since:
- Videogame critiques on youtube are quite popular (and have been for years)
- Joseph Anderson is one of the most popular video game critics. His (second!) Fallout 4 critique has 10+ million views
- Lies of P is a very popular game which came out this year, and souls-likes in general are very popular games which people love to talk about
Also I wholehartedly disagree with downvoting something as spam when you have no idea what it is. And why do you need me to tell you what "we're" doing here? It's not for me to say whether this is a thread for roasting the game or praising it or anything else. I'm not sure I could even think of a more clear, straightforward title (and it's simply the video title).
I also don't feel it's my obligation to share my thoughts on something I post. As OP I prefer for people to think for themselves and form their own opinion about the content.
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
I had the same thought lol
mrh 10 months ago • 75%
Yeah is there some specific reason that I'm missing? I've never posted something like this before anywhere on lemmy.
mrh 10 months ago • 75%
I'm not trying to push an agenda. I don't know what you mean by "picking and choosing writings". I'm still not sure exactly what you're saying.
If you're saying there are no such thing as "founding fathers", I think that's just wrong in the sense that the myth of the founding fathers is a part of American culture and is taught in American schools. There is no "founding father" gene or element, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
If you're saying all the people who were delegates at those conventions are equally "founding fathers" because they helped forge the documents, then sure, I can respect that opinion. But some of those delegates undoubtedly played a significantly larger role in early American history than others (including the creation of those documents!). Hence why we learn about a select few of them, and not all ~100 (although I guess that would also be impractical in a school setting). The specific number 7 is a bit arbitrary, but ~10 were a lot more important than the rest.
mrh 10 months ago • 66%
Sure there's some degree of arbitriness to 7, but I don't think you could reasonably claim it's any less than 7, and 7 is even a number wikipedia throws around. Not that there are only 7, just that there are 7 particularly important ones.
I really just think the 13 the current US flag has looks too busy, but this is the only "American" number I could think of which was less than 13. If you have others I'd love to hear!
Can you say more about the stars? Are you against them being in a circle?
There's not really any way to have them "fill up" the blue while still being in a circle (even if you change their sizes), unless you change the ratio of the blue, which would cause it to deviate from that of the flag itself. Maybe I can cook up a 2:3 version for ya.
As for the size of the stars, again they are in the maximum radius circle which fits in the blue, so can't change their position, and making them any bigger would cause them to touch each other or at least feel cramped.
The stars in a circle in the blue is a classic American design which has been done on the flag before (besty ross, cowpens, etc.).
mrh 10 months ago • 57%
I don’t understand. What do the delegates of the Second Continental Congress and Constitutional Convention have to do with anything?
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
Alright look just because a certain someone made the best of all these “style” designs doesn’t mean the motherland doesn’t deserve at least a little better.
Though the large center star is the least compelling aspect due to the similarity, perhaps it should be the same size as the others.
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
Yes that is probably the most similar of all (real) US variant flags. Compared to Cowpens: less stripes, upright stars, one more star in the circle (14 vs 13 total), and the center star being larger than the rest.
Though perhaps the most similar other flag is the one used by Ulysses in Lonesome Road.
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
Metroidvanias of knowledge a la Outer Wilds
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
Probably my favorite dm album of 2022, and I had never heard of them before!
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
Have you heard something recent? I feel Signal has been saying that for years now.
mrh 10 months ago • 100%
I don’t care about XMPP as a protocol versus some other messaging protocol much, but I care a fair bit about the wdespread adoption of federated XMPP
I don't quite understand what this means, could you elaborate?
if this service using this protocol becomes very popular, will the service seek to eliminate the open role of the protocol
That is a valid concern, though the point of the article is to try and convince people why it won't happen like it did with Google or might with Meta for structural reasons (rather than "oh but we're different" reasons).
The main difference I see with Snikket vs Google Talk is that Snikket is not only libre client software, but libre server software as well. The point of Snikket is that individual people host it themselves, not that the Snikket devs run a bunch of Snikket servers which require their Snikket client for connection and just so happen to use xmpp to power it. Really all Snikket is (right now) is a prosody server with some pre-configurations and easy install, as well as an android/ios app which are general xmpp clients that are designed to work well when connected with Snikket servers.
Now it could still go south in a similar way to Google Talk, in that maybe a bunch of people start running Snikket servers and using Snikket clients, and then the Snikket devs start wall gardening the implementation. That would be bad, but the users (both server runners and client users) would be in a much stronger position to pivot away from those decisions.
I think it's at least an interesting idea (hence why I posted it) for the reasons the author mentions: striking a balance between trustless freedom and interface stability/agility.
mrh 10 months ago • 80%
That sounds roughly correct, though I don't see the connection with the article? Unless you're saying that "products" (like Signal) will always exist, which is probably true but is orthogonal to whether or not other models will succeed.
As for email, I think posteo does a pretty good job, but you're right options are few and far between. But self hosting email is just as viable as ever? Perhaps less so since e.g. gmail will instantly flag your incoming mail as spam if you're sending it from randomsite.tld, but honestly that issue hasn't gotten that bad (yet). Yes, whenever there's a protocol like email or xmpp, companies will create gmails and signals and turn them into walled gardens, but that doesn't spoil the protocol for everyone else. It just causes frustration that companies build closed products on top of open technologies, but not much to be done about that.