TheCee 11 months ago • 100%
This. And, unlike Lombok, there is no -deUnfinalize. Sure seems like youre stuck with fixing your codebase, when this thing finally folds.
TheCee 11 months ago • 100%
I'm glad it doesnt.
TheCee 11 months ago • 100%
Another red flag for people hired to maintain that code, I guess.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
That guys' as well.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
Ok, so here is a question: What's with her right hand? I could swear I have seen this gesture in other paintings before. Is this some sort of artist custom?
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
Just try, what is the worst that could happen? Hehe-- [sound of breaking bones and rupturing organs]
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
Oni would be great, problem is the rights to it are split between like five different studios and it’s effectively abandoned. It’s why it’s not on GOG, Steam, etc.
Possibly the same situation for Attack of the Saucerman. Dayum.
It also wouldn’t surprise me if the source code has been completely lost, meaning there’s no chance of an HD upscale or anything.
Oh well, realistically, an upscale and a few improvements wouldn't have cut it anyway.
TheCee 12 months ago • 83%
- Oni
- Attack Of The Saucerman
- Urban Chaos (the older one, not sure about the new one)
- Half of the legit stuff Sseth reviewed.
This might be a controversial talk.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
Was it an intended pun?
Unfortunately, no.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
Yet I think that had Judaism been more proselytist, it would have gained more followers and, probably, been more fanatical and aggressive.
Yes, that's what I'm counting on, since I assume that ideas like religions take part in a long-term process of evolution. Unfortunately, the most whackiest, edgiest religions seem to be the most fit. Therefore my answer to the top level post.
TheCee 12 months ago • 50%
I never said brainwashing children was ok as far as I can recall.
Fair enough, you didn't. I apologize. I lost track of the chain of posters and mixed you up with the first poster who didn't seem to recognize the dangers of passing belief to children.
As for Judaism, I stand by what I said: it’s not proselytist in the way other religions are, trying to convert other people. I don’t judge it as bad or as good, I don’t care. I just state a fact as I’ve seen/read.
That may be case. Which is possibly why, historically speaking, Judaism doesn't seem to be on the winning side. Which is bad, because it means opportunities for more fanatical, agressive religions.
TheCee 12 months ago • 75%
That’s not proselytising, it’s a while different thing
I don't see your point. How is brainwashing children ok when wololo-ing people is not? Even from an egocentric perspective, you have to live in a society.
TheCee 12 months ago • 44%
Pretty sure you can be born into judaism, though. Chances are, it is even the default scenario with even semi-religious parents.
That's not "keeping to yourself" to me. That's like passing the cigarettes to your kids.
TheCee 12 months ago • 84%
If religious can keep to themselves
Since religions compete, that doesn't sound feasible.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
On second though, it doesn't seem like a big improvement. Reminds me a bit of limbfeeders without limbs.
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
This, it would be less deep in the uncanny valley without eyes at all.
TheCee 12 months ago • 83%
Git, probably
TheCee 12 months ago • 88%
Please clarify, OP, did you mean
- hard to read semantically
- hard to read syntactically
- hard to relate how one could come with such a crappy idea, even considering all constraints of their time
- takes a lot brain real estate (justified or not)
?
TheCee 12 months ago • 100%
selfies of himself in klan attire
"I'm an american viking." (Also some bullshit how he'd be genetically viking.)
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
What about square screens?
inb4 chaotic neckpain
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Unfortunately nobody in charge has seen consequences for their decision to save a few theoretical nickels, so far. But then again, a lot of software/IT related stuff would look completely different, if anybody did.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Indeed. Makes it more work to filter the handful of good or even great articles from the 99.99% that use this platform for its apparent ease of money grubbing.
TheCee 1 year ago • 85%
It'll probably take Valhalla for me, personally.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Thanks!
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
This seems to complicate it, and I imagine someone else would still need to do the footwork and/or it’d require C/C++ knowledge.
It seems like GDScript is already way less dynamic than Python and a bunch of optimizations has been done accordingly.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Or a signal that you'd rather not support the worst way to introduce type systems to frontend dev. While I'm not sure that applies to DHH, I am sure there are other devs that understand compromising all your goals to codepend on Node or even JS itself isn't that much of a win and rather see support for better options.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
but I could see it being a good step forward for more meaningful features to be added in the future.
I think you are right. And that is unfortunate.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Yes. While its breadth is amazing, the devs seem to keep changing everything which keeps me from exploring anything.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Yeah, total waste of time.
goes back to playing DCSS
TheCee 1 year ago • 50%
My bad, I'm not deep enough into our frontend stack to realize Hjeilsberg already did what he does best - ruining enums. (I guess he is not to blame for global imports in c#, so i can not add 'questionable import module/namespace ideas'.)
And it seems like this proposal contains type declarations (in order to compensate for their enums), among other typescript specific things. So, guess it is option B, then.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
That's not a positive, though.
Depending on how it pans out, it's either not useful enough. Who the hell doesn't use namespaces or enums. Or - as
These constructs are not in the scope of this proposal, but could be added by separate TC39 proposals.
implies - a door opener to outsource TypeScripts problem unto other peoples and not to investing into improving WebAssembly. That's just MS being lazy and making their problems other peoples problems.
I feel like this would be the ideal scenario: things working right out of the box without needing a compile step or additional tooling.
It's just annotations. No proposed semantics of a type system which your browser could check on its own.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
That for sure looks fancy. Well, if I could draw to save my life, I'd definitely include it.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
The lamp rotates along its post. Booom, solved.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Requested: A clown version of the Critters-posting-on-4chan meme, with a horn on the desk and a red nose put around the screen.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Thanks, might be worth a try.
TheCee 1 year ago • 100%
Hi, I'm using the one that is built-in.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/2433863 > Hi, does anybody know the state of recent (2020 and onward) FX releases regarding supporting Wayland? > Thank you.
Hi, does anybody know the state of recent (2020 and onward) FX releases regarding supporting Wayland? Thank you.
Hi, does anyone know how to accomplish this? So far my workaround has been wrapping them in pre tags. Thanks in advance!
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1941692 > cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1941671 > > > Details in the link of the headline.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1941671 > Details in the link of the headline.
Details in the link of the headline.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1890996 > (That's the title of this page.)
(That's the title of this page.)
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1245230 > Hi, what is the most primitive programming language (esolangs included) that you can think of or make up that could still be reasonably well^1^ supported by a language server (or similar piece of software)? > > 1 We have to draw a line somewhere, so I'd figure capabilities > > - highlight semantic errors > - renaming stuff safely, that is: > - without confirmation > - without evaluating parts of the code > - proper completion (not just best guess) > - go to definition/show use > > I appreciate your answers!
Hi, what is the most primitive programming language (esolangs included) that you can think of or make up that could still be reasonably well^1^ supported by a language server (or similar piece of software)? 1 We have to draw a line somewhere, so I'd figure capabilities - highlight semantic errors - renaming stuff safely, that is: - without confirmation - without evaluating parts of the code - proper completion (not just best guess) - go to definition/show use I appreciate your answers!
Hi, by now it seems to be common knowledge that passwords shouldn't be stored in a database. Backend devs generally know to hash and salt and what-not their transmitted passwords. It seems to be well documented. However, I wasn't exactly able to find such a clear answer for client applications accessing e.g. web APIs. For example, lets assume you were to create a Lemmy desktop application with support for multiple accounts. Ideally, that software would work like a password manager and store its master password as hash only. However(2), sometimes users like to start said application without entering their password. Like an Email client in pleb mode. Which requires the passwords to be stored somewhere. In this case, what is the best course of action?
Not exactly new, but I haven't seen this here. Not sure what is happening in the content box. The title is a link, though.
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1086370 > This time on my arbitrary blog: Entity component systems. > > Also, highlight.js should degrade more gracefully without JS activated than last time. Note that I can't process syntax highlighting in my build step, because I don't have a build step. EDIT: improved phrasing
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/1086370 > This time on my arbitrary blog: Entity component systems. > > Also, highlight.js should degrade more gracefully without JS activated than last time. Note that I can't process syntax highlighting in my build step, because I don't have a build step. EDIT: improved phrasing