Sidebar
Modlog
Banned for suggesting violence against children is bad after being harassed by another commenter. I reported them, removed all contributions and withdrew my participation in that community until the issue is resolved. Turns out they are a community moderator and banned me for reporting them breaking their own rules on civility. They continued to provoke and escalate after I disengaged.
normally wouldn’t be a problem but there have been some significant world events over the past week which has resulted in this community being a hotbed for calls to violence, violating [instance rule 1.1](https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/) edit: they seem hopefully to be back 🤞
**Context:** In a discussion about a small apartment listing described as "perfect for a full-time female student," the above transphobic comment was made in regard to who would post such a listing. The comment is transphobic because it: 1. **Misgenders**: Puts "woman" in quotes, invalidating trans women's gender. 2. **Stereotypes**: Suggests trans women might transition for ulterior motives, perpetuating harmful stereotypes. 3. **Undermines Identity**: Implies trans women are fundamentally different and suspect compared to cis women.
I tried looking it up in the modlog, but it doesn't seem to go back far enough
Lemmygrad.ml is being bombarded by spam bots!
Via lemmy.world/modlog
cross-posted from: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29633 > When I opened this site 5 days ago, I could not have guessed that I would post such a post. But here we are. > > As you know, we did a poll on this topic [here](https://lemmynsfw.com/post/26029). Around 40% of people said to block, the rest said to not to. In such cases, we wanted to make the poll, even though it doesn't matter. > > Right now, I'm still currently agreeing with [@bobbiguy2122](https://lemmynsfw.com/u/bobbiguy2122) [here](https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/82152). We are going to let community moderators handle the situation in within limits. So it's going to be users choice to subscribe to that community or creating new one with his own rules. > > #### Why not completely block it > If we are going to split, there is so many fractions as well. As someone who only likes women and plain porn, I don't want to ban tentacle, futanari or gay stuff. Because even though they are kinky, they are also a pleasure. > > Being attracted to petite teens is just like these pleasures, and the vast majority actually like it. I think we should not ban this pleasure just because it is in a dangerous area. > > #### As a result > First of all we will explicitly ban IRL loli images. Although we will allow non-IRL content under moderator control, tho we will control childish content independently of moderators too. We will make this distinction according to images that look and act like children. > > #### Defederation > I see a lot of people are worried about this situation. But I don't care. Because as you can see, beehaw, one of the largest instances, blocked the other 2 largest instances. This situation is inevitable in NSFW only instances like us. As a result, you must have one main account, where you can access all instances, and one NSFW account, where you can only access NSFW content. For example, I don't plan to block any instances on this instance, except in extreme cases.
cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/743962 > I can see the reasoning behind all the other instances, but what was the red flag situation with reddthat?
Crosspost from !anarchychess@sopuli.xyz
"When we said you should nationalize controversial industries, steal from the rich, enshrine corruption, and grow the welfare state, we meant you should do it in a *nice, aesthetically pleasing way* that panders to our social demographic."
