Cars are not living organisms, are not species, and they serve us in every way, not the other way around.

Braindead take.

I'm sorry did you mistype? I can't know what it's like to not have children? Everyone knows what it's like to not have children, no one is brought into this world already having children. What the fuck are you even trying to say?

And your sexuality comparison is stupid because sexuality is something you're born with, and you can try the other side without permanently changing yourself, unlike parenthood.

Everything you said is objectively wrong.

"I refuse to be just another person doing something because of chemicals and biology."

Then I've got some bad new for you. Everything you do is because of chemicals and biology. You felt the need to post this dumbass comment because of chemicals and biology. Everything that you have ever done and ever will do are because of chemicals in your brain telling you to do things. You will never outsmart these chemicals because you are these chemicals.

For all intents and purposes, they are magical feelings that come out of nowhere and make you feel happy and patient and full of love for your child.

Something which you clearly don't understand at all, which only serves to further prove my original point, so I guess thank you?

Intelligent, mature adults do a lot of good things too, so your argument is literally meaningless.

Another strawman argument. I never said anything about biology. Adoptive parents are still parents. Your siblings are still your siblings.

It's still different than a child someone considers as "not theirs".

And btw you were a child, you weren't ready for that kind of responsibility and shouldn't have had to do those things, and I'm genuinely sorry that you had to experience that, and I'm glad your siblings had someone in their life to look out for them. I'm sure that made all the difference to them.

I agree with every word of that, except the first line. My point is that OP cannot possibly know if owning pets will provide them the same satisfaction as having children because they've never had children.

No one here is actually disputing what I actually said, because what I actually said is correct. I made a statement, and everyone threw their strawman arguments at me.

"You're comparing taking a shit with the hours long process of labor and bringing a life into the world. The 2 are nowhere near comparable."

Thank you for agreeing with me, I'm glad you came around.

"You're comparing taking a shit with the hours long process of labor and bringing a life into the world. The 2 are nowhere near comparable."

Thank you for agreeing with me, I'm glad you came around.

Friend, this is a forum website designed for discussion and interaction. If you want an echo chamber, I'm sure there are places dedicated to that, but this is not it.

Start your own private instance, only allow specific people in, close that shit up tight if you want.

This is not that place.

Mature and intelligent in the scientific sense. As in "intelligent life".

Holding someone else's child is completely different from holding your own child that you created and gave life to. OP has never held their own child, and therefore cannot possibly say that pet ownership gives them the same satisfaction.

Op is talking about holding their pet, an experience they have had, and holding their child, an experience they have not had. Therefore they absolutely cannot try to compare the two.

All OP can say is that having pets gives them the same enjoyment as holding someone else's baby, which is most likely absolutely true. But that's not what was said. They tried to equate pet ownership to bringing and nurturing a life into this world and I'm sorry but that's fucking ridiculous, period.

Okay and my great uncle Fred took a dump that he insists was as difficult to pass as a human child. Since he's talking about his experiences, not anyone else's, he must be right, right? By your logic my uncle Fred genuinely knows what childbirth feels like, correct?

Or does the fact that he has never experienced childbirth exclude him from making such comparisons?

I'm sorry but they are indeed comparable. It's someone who has never experienced something pretending they know what it's like.

Nothing about this equivalency is false. You are wrong.

Exactly, a child becomes an intelligent, mature adult. A person. A real person walking around, feeling things, talking to people, sharing knowledge and ideas and experiences. No part of pet ownership can emulate that.

A childless person saying "I can get the same hit from cats and small dogs" is like a cis man saying "I can get the same experience as childbirth by performing a large bowel movement".

But most men never want to experience childbirth, and that's fine. There's nothing wrong with that. Just like there's nothing wrong with not wanting kids. But pets absolutely cannot replicate actual children, just like a bowel movement can never replicate the experience of childbirth.

"They make some beautiful fabrics."

I'm sure they do but it seems like you'd need an awful lot of frogs.

City folks don't know about crop rotation.

SimAnt was fucking legendary. It really deserves a worthy successor, I guess Ant Simulator wasn't it.

I'm sorry but you simply don't seem to understand how imagery and symbolism works.

The artists intent is very clear. You are trying so hard to defend this random dumb comic strip on the internet instead of just admitting it's a dumb comic strip on the internet.

Human psychology's standard.

If anyone in this thread had ever actually been in a multiple partner relationship they would realize how shitty it feels.

Spoken like an inexperienced fool who's never been cheated on.

You can't love someone and cheat on them. Thats not love, that's one of the most egregious betrayals of trust a human can commit.

"Nothing saying cheating is good"

In the cheating section there are 3 smiling faces and 2 bright red hearts, one of which is wearing "cool" sunglasses.

The monoamory tile has a frowning face, a big red x, and a broken heart.

I'm sorry but the imagery is definitely there, despite your decision to disregard it.

Look at cheating, then look at monoamory, then try to tell me this "guide" doesn't have some fucked up bias.

Based on this post alone, would someone think cheating or monoamory is worse?

Passive aggressively dismissive of standard relationships while fantasizing about having multiple interested partners.

Very much seems like someone's "sour grapes" attempt at explaining why they're alone.

i.e. "I don't have a SO because my views on relationships are incompatible with most, totally not because of my personality, or lack thereof."

Every dynamic depicted here is shown with positive labels and imagery except the normal monoamorous relationship. Monoamory is depicted as neglectful and harmful, and labeled "idealized" as if the idea is absurd or unattainable.

Hell, CHEATING is depicted with less negative imagery than monoamory.

This post reeks of incel fantasy.

Fuly the Jorth

Yeah it felt like it was for casual rpg player. It was fun, the writing and gameplay was great, but it certainly lacked depth in some areas.

Anyone who bought this game expecting anything less than this exact shitshow deserves their fate.

Bad troll is bad.

I'm not on an alt. I'm getting upvotes because I'm right and you're wrong. What the fuck are you even talking about? Are you trying to troll? Is this your sad attempt at trolling?

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. Just stop trying. Your username alone proves that you're a bullshit liar and here in bad faith.

Go away.

to prove it I would literally have to do it myself

So no one else is doing this? If it's not a thing that's happening, why are you here trying to undermine the voting process?

You're the only one here threatening to abuse the voting system.