Manipulating vim.g.clipboard is the trick. I'll have to write some command that sets the clipboard provider directly.

Thats for sure what's happening. The remaining error message makes that clear but I couldn't copy the full message

They should change directors and aesthetics completely when they do the fourth book. Only Jason Mamoa is consistent.

fwiw headscale is pretty easy to self host and has minimal system requirements.

It is funny that involvement in Afghanistan has been passed back and forth between the US an Russia for half a century. Before that it was the UK and Russia. But thats not what the meme is about. The meme revels in its own ignorance of the situation.

Yes, ISKP is a direct consequence of US meddling in the region. Many of it's members were our collaborators. But I think you're being unfair here if you're going to equate Russia trying to stabilize the Taliban's rule with America's failure to replace it. Its possible that Russia's involvement can escalate like it did in the 80s but I doubt that'll happen. That would be like the America deciding to send troops to Vietnam again.

Finally anyone who has a grain’s worth of intuition about the world’s politics would know that what Russia calls “a partnership against terrorism” is a cover up for continuing to meddle in affairs of middle eastern countries

See that's just it. You're operating off you're preconceived notions instead of the facts on the ground. The fact is the ISKP is operating in northern Afghanistan and is a threat to literally everyone in the region. When you put that into perspective, the meme is not funny and is massively ignorant. Despite all the injustices the Taliban commits, the Islamic State is far far worse. They're the ones actively suicide bombing Hazari women and the only ones who can stop them are, regrettably the Taliban. Thats a grim and morbid reality, because the Taliban is racist as hell against Hazari's but they aren't genocidal like the Islamic State. We'd both like to seem some progressive secular democracy in the region but we spent two decades pissing any chances of that away.

Yeah they're hyper conservative religious zealots. I have many criticisms of them. Islamic state is far far worse though. Can you at least recognize that the Islamic State is worse?

I never said they didn't arm them. I explicitly stated multiple times that we agreed on this front. All I stated is that the only islamists doing terrorism are the wahhabists and then you're like "ah BUT did you consider that the CIA funded those terrorists???" as though that disproves anything I said.

You tried to frame what should've been an "yes AND" as some disagreement. There is no disagreement.

All I'm doing is pointing out the a the Islamic State is strictly worse than the Taliban and its good that the Taliban are fighting them. I'd prefer it'd be someone other than the Taliban but that doesn't change the facts.

Making fun of the Taliban for joining forces against the Islamic State, the terrorists from the meme is defending them.

The Islamic State are the ones suicide bombing Hazari women at the moment not the Taliban.

And are you simping for the Islamic State?

I think we're done here after that embarrassing tantrum.

No. And no patience for the semantic argument you're wasting my time with when we both agree on the material reality

I said "Islamic terrorism is almost exclusively the domain of wahhabi's" and you're argueing, "what if the CIA funded the wahhabi's?" as though that contradicts my point.

I don't know what the disagreement is. Its always the wahhabi's executing the actual terrorism. If you want to lump in their sponsors, like is said, "go off". But you're framing it like I'm ignorant of that which I'm not.

Pull your head out of your ass. Assaulting protestors is something every government does, legitimate or not. How many countries can you name that haven't assaulted protestors? Even Jefferson's "watering the tree of liberty" quote is about murdering protestors.

Now if you actually read into the article you posted, the Hazari women were protesting the Taliban's lack of response to an actual terrorist suicide bombing by ISKP. The Islamic State has been aggressively massacring Hazari's ever since the US left. That said, its not like the Taliban are the friends of Hazari's, they just aren't massacring them.

I specified "Islamic terrorists" for a reason but go off.

Ripits are only for butt chugging

Agreed, but they are the official energy drink of the US Army. I'm sure more than one private had boofed a ripit. Sorry you didn't get a Charger. You would've love it.

The Taliban is an illegitimate government in Afghanistan

They won the war. Its their state now.

acts of violence for political means. The very definition of Terorism.

Something literally every government must do is the definition of terrorist. Something fundamental to the nature of being a state is terrorism. Jesus Christ you're brainwashed.

Those are the terrorists the Taliban is currently fighting. Islamic State Khorasan Province, ISKP.

Accusing people of being a bot while giving the most meme-template response in defense of the Islamic State.

The Taliban never support Wahhabism and only tolerated Al-Queada. They offered to hand Bin Laden over to us immediately after 9/11 and we refused.

The Taliban is more of a product of Pakistani ISI than the CIA.

I have personal experience with the Taliban

I can smell the RipIts spilling out of your Dodge Charger.

Islamic State Khorasan Province is a grade A terrorist organization.

Not exactly, the Taliban was never a part of the Mujahedin. They don't show up until after the soviets leave and the US looses interest. They did however grow out Madrassas that were jointly sponsored by the USA and KSA.

This is unfortunately just a really good edit.

People who can't fathom this also can't fathom that Iran offered to help the US invade Afghanistan because they wanted Al-Queada off their doorstep. Then we put them on the Axis of Evil and took 20 years to loose a war.

If this confuses you then you are extremely misinformed and operating on the ignorant notion that "radical Islamist" = "terrorist". The Taliban never embraced terrorism as a tactic. Unless you're so brainwashed that you think IEDs are terrorism. Islamic terrorism has almost exclusively been the domain of Wahhabists like Al-Queada and Islamic State

The Taliban is currently fighting Islamic State Khorasan Province, which is largely constituted of former collaborators of the coalition government. Everyone in the region would much rather have the Taliban as a neighbor than those genocidal freaks.

The kicker is ISKP is largely made up former collaborators of the occupational government.

I think PopOS can safely assume that its being installed on a laptop with only one drive. If there's multiple drives involved then the setup gets far more complicated as you then must go to something like an LUKS on LVM setup. Basically, for a desktop there's no safe defaults for FDE.

I'm pretty sure all the major distros have FDE as an option in the installer its just never on by default. Fedora does the same but with BTRFS on LUKS. I'm sure Debian does. Someone else says OpenSuse does. Maybe some derivative distros don't but I suspect the ones with an graphical installer do.

Looks like they use eCryptFS. Never heard of it before so thats neat. I can see using it on systems where you can't reinstall the system with Dm-crypt but it most cases I suspect Dm-crypt is a better alternative.

Idk if its faster or slower than Dm-crypt.

The standard route is to decrypt on boot. It happens after GRUB but before your display manager starts. IDK if there even is a setup that has you "decrypt on login". Thats sounds like your display manager (sddm for KDE) is decrypting system which is not possible IMO.

Unless your laptop somehow has multiple drives you'll want to use the "LVM on LUKS" configuration. 1 small partition for /boot. The rest gets LUKS encrypted, and an LVM group is put on the LUKS container. Or you could replace LVM with btrfs.

This will require wiping your system and reinstalling so you have some reading to do.

• https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt (aka LUKS)
• https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/System_configuration
• https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system
• https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system#LVM_on_LUKS

The arch-install script in the live iso has options for full disk encryption.

If you suspend to RAM your system will stay unencrypted, because your ram is not encrypted. if you suspend to disk (aka hibernate) your system will be encrypted. You go through the boot loader when waking from hibernation but it just drops you off where you left off.

You need a swapfile for hibernation so make sure its inside the LUKS container.

Unironically try turning your computer off and on again.

Tmux settings are global and persistent. Just deleting your config files is insufficient. You have to kill the server and restart it. Uninstalling and reinstalling will not kill a running tmux server. tmux kill-server should work too.

Now if it persists across reboots, then there must be a file still lingering somewhere. If you are sure your home directory is clean you can try searching whatever you installed in /etc.

This is all assuming you're trying to go back to a clean slate and failing. If the borked status bar is the result of your current .tmux.conf, then you'll have to post that.

I spent like a week on this last month. Usually you use enumeration, but I wanted to allow client code to define their own strategies. I tried the Box<dyn MyTrait> pattern because some of my strategies were composed of other strategies, and I wanted to clamp down on generic types. But I kept running into weirder and weirder compiler errors. Always asking for an additional restriction on the base trait. X, must be Copy, must be Send, must be Sized, must be 'static. On and on. My experience is if I'm getting a bunch of those then I'm off the Golden Path. So I just embraced the verbosity of using generics and its easy. Yes its more code but its better code.

Its going installed binary is rg.

Irrelevant to the point I'm making. We, the US, are the ones starving Venezuelans, not Maduro. Everything else is none of our business.

… but it’s the US imperialism that’s at fault, obviously

It's literally the direct consequence of US sanctions. That's the literal goal of sanctions.

Holy fuck the Gravel Institute is a nostalgia trip. Can't believe those kids still have a job.