> implying you don't know what an implication arrow is

it's one of these: >

other than dire emergencies

if you got to ditch the cart for safety, that's fine

n = 40, this is junk. they couldn't even get 100 people for this?

these were all sampled from 1 company in amsterdam. the differences could be explained by company culture, or local culture, or whatever. more work needed.

here you go:

more can be found like this, @chichi__charlie in any good web browser

gato

yay! 🥳

oh my goodness that's a painting

i was scrolling idly and thought it was a mid smartphone photo

wow 🤯

it's an example of simpson's paradox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_paradox

a worked example: if england/scotland/wales all use heart ❤️ 49% and use tears of joy 😂 at 51%, and then northern ireland was to use heart ❤️at 100%, you can imagine this would tip the whole uk over

even more freaky, you could make all 4 constituent countries use heart ❤️ at 49%, make each constituent use a different unique emoji 👍😀🥰😼 at 51% each, and then the aggregate would show that heart ❤️ is still the most used across the UK

now consider for each place on this map, they are ranking more than just 2 emojis. the map itself says that tears of joy 😂 is only scoring 5% worldwide, and that's 1st place. with margins of 5% and under to be deemed winner, it's no wonder funky effects show up

aww it's like hardstyle shuffle rave phat pants!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1yCZ_iHPfg

this was my approach

detailed annotation for screen readers here: 4 lines have been added to the original depiction. the first set of 2 lines make a triangle shape using coordinates (4, 2.5) to (4, 0) to (7, 0). the second set of 2 lines make a triangle shape using coordinates (4, 2.5) to (8, 2.5) to (8, 1)

ok, here's the context. (click here)

the source of this file, regrettably, is the daily mail. broken clocks and all that. i will link the "article" that the video file was from, but you will need a hazmat suit going in, for both the cookies/trackers and low quality writing

here's that source now. (click here)

for posters below saying they couldn't find this, i understand it. we all get different search results, it's possible you all got hugboxed and were unable to find the clip as a result

also, i don't care to discuss the topic, i only wanted to link the source, because you were all struggling with it. i like finding sources :)

have a nice day 🥰

why would future humans bother bringing all these people back

i think it's worth reminding why doctors treat people now, in this time and space. they do it mostly because they want to save people. maybe a few do it for money, but past a certain point, the money isn't why you do it. i think it's a safe bet that doctors of a future would see these corpses as patients, and act accordingly. an analogy - think how we see heart attack victims as patients, and not how our medieval ancestors would have seen them (as corpses)

...literally nothing positive to contribute to the utopian future...

true, but, a good chunk of patients in hopsital today have nothing to contribute to society, and cannot contribute any more, whatsoever. we treat them anyway, because that's what we do. humans have consistently cared for others that are sick and have "nothing to contribute" throughout history, and that shows no sign of going away anytime soon

here's one example for you (click here) exploring igbo gender norms

here's a second report that's worth reading too (click here)

i don't have much knowledge about the other cultures suggested, others can provide info for those

nice video, i'm glad i watched through the whole thing. it's good to understand the perspective

i have a lot of major hangups with the concept, and i don't see myself aligning anywhere close to these ideas anytime soon, but i think it's positive to be shown the principles of anarchy from someone who believes them, rather than a strawman version of anarchy by someone who does not

thank you for posting :)

let me innn!

okay, here's al jazeera reporting on the ballistic missile, it's a one liner but it's something

this is a saturation attack imo, the question is, at what target?

citing abc news (link here), us official says 400 to 500 drones

unconfirmed reports of ballistic missiles in the air too, it's all osint right now so no good source on that yet, if i get one i'll add it as a reply

take a look here at the papa johns live activity meter next to the pentagon on google maps 🍕

oh god they're actually doing it

i'll be honest, unless you're at the west coast of ireland, probably give this one a miss. :(

okay, using the words listed at the start of this wikipedia article, here's where i place myself:

analyze/center/defense/labour/organize/program

or, British 1, American 5, Canadian 4, Australian 2

it's a nice litmus test to see where you're at. i knew i used to skew NA in writing style, but i didn't think by that much

i mean, i really dont want to be that poster, but he's not being arrested for blocking with a scooter, he's being arrested for protesting

there's a separate discussion to be had about arresting protesters, but the way they're trying to spin this as "they oppressed a disabled person for being disabled" is honestly insulting to the agency of disabled people that choose to protest, and whom accept the risk of consequences for doing so

in my mind, you can't be both trying to normalize disability, and then also weaponizing it when it suits you for an opinion piece after being arrested. in particular, i take offense to the line in the article: "Now prosecuting disabled people to (sic) acting ‘socially responsibly’", as if that's magically a step too far?

a "fairer" title here would have been something like "activist prosecuted for deftly showcasing how climate risks disproportionately affect disabled people". although, it wouldn't have been as attention grabby, and so none of us would be reading it...

yep, you're entirely right. for your area, it's more effective to run wells for each person. the frustrating part being that, it implies that the city has been designed so, so badly, that individuals can't actually share resources, without the per capita price going up if they do so.

even without depopulation, that's a huge governmental failure. if individuals are having to run all their own utility setups and infrastructure, is that even a "city"? it sounds more like rural living but it's all vaguely connected. presumably as a result of this low density, you have higher ongoing costs elsewhere? i.e commutes to work, cost of food, etc

if not, then it could be one of those taxpayer-subsidised things, where it feels cheaper for each resident, but the reality is that someone else is paying for it. i'm not good at wording what i mean in this case, but i will pass you to this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI) to show it instead, he does a better job of explaining what i'm talking about

anyhow... that's crazy! it's entirely the thing i'm worried about seeing replicated large scale as a result of a reduction in population

i do get where you're coming from, population density was less than it was. as a consequence, people had less access to resources. i would argue as a result of this, they also had less quality of life. the reason that urbanization has been a trend over the past 150 years that shows no sign of stopping, is because population urbanization is a multiplier on the effectiveness of quality of life, because it makes the cost to maintain higher quality of life cheaper per unit of life.^1^

for example, yes, you can supply a neighbourhood with individual wells, granted. but surely it would be cheaper for your community to build one massive well, and then everyone in the neighbourhood can collect the water at the well? the community could all pay their share to maintain the well, and then the per unit cost of the well would be cheaper to build and maintain.

whilst you're at it, since there's only one well, you can put in a really fancy pump and purifier system. a really high quality rig, with low cost to run. that way, you only need to maintain 1 efficient pump and purifier, rather than 20 or 30 less efficient ones that would cost more fuel to run as an aggregate. the unit cost per person of the pump and purifier setup would be cheaper to run and maintain.

if you wanna go really bougie, you could all chip in to collectively install pipes to every house so that your local community doesn't have to walk to the well. if you build slightly more pipes than you need, this would act as insurance so that if one pipe breaks, you don't all lose supply, and the water could flow round... other pipes... and... ...wait this just sounds like a municipal supply but with extra steps...

i know i'm being facetious, but the reality is that it is just not measurably cheaper to live out in isolated pockets, through supplying individual infrastructure on a per person basis.^2^ economies of scale dictates this relationship.^3^ it's inescapable.^4^. it's inevitable.^5^ by all means, if it's the only option someone has to provide utilities for themself, they should use it. but let's not pretend that it's more expensive to group up, live closer, and share the cost burden through communal resources.

i will trust you are aware of "economies of scale", but i have linked a video here for those who are not aware, and also don't want to read papers like a total nerd. ☝️🤓

[1]. (??? what would the units for quality of life per capita be i wonder? joy/kg? lol)

[2]. "The results indicate that cost savings can be achieved by increases in the scale of production...", from "Productivity growth, economies of scale and scope in the water and sewerage industry: The Chilean case", by Molinos-Senante and Maziotis, accessible at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8162666/

[3]. "...more spread out settlement (“Dispersion”) leads to diseconomies in distribution...", from "Economies of scale, distribution costs and density effects in urban water supply: a spatial analysis of the role of infrastructure in urban agglomeration", by Hugh B., accessible at https://etheses.lse.ac.uk/285/

[4]. "...agglomeration economies make firms and workers more productive in dense urban environments than in other locations.", from "The economics of urban density", by Duranton and Pupa, accssible at https://diegopuga.org/research.html#density

[5]. "Econometric analysis of the data from the Big Mac price survey revealed a significant positive effect of being in a rural area on the increase in prices.", from "Identifying the size and geographic scope of short-term rural cost-of-living increases in the United States", by Díaz-Dapena, Loveridge & Paredes, accessible at "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00168-023-01244-z"

sure, i'll try to explain briefly

"infrastructure", i.e utilities, transport, bureacracy etc is built to support a fixed population within a city. when the population increases, you have to build more infrastructure to support this new population. this part is easy, you expand your cities at their edges, extend the utilities, and set up satellite bureacracy offices if needed

the tricky part is when you lose population. the correct move would be to demolish this infrastructure and scale back. trouble is, not only would this be wasteful, but it would also leave gaps in cities, since population decline doesn't happen uniformly from a city edge. where exactly, do you demolish the infrastructure?

it would be nice if we live in a theoretical world where, as population decreases, the cities magically shrink at their edges, and suburban residents move closer in to fill the gaps. this is not how populations deplete from an area though (example: detroit, 1950 - 2020)

you will struggle to convince a suburban homeowner at the edge, to sell up and move to one of the gaps left behind by population loss. if we stop short of rewriting laws to force this population transfer, the end result is that you are left with a "swiss cheese" city. houses and settlements will be spread so thinly that becomes impossible for city goverments to provide "infrastructure" without providing it at a loss. your local goverment will then take debt and bankrupt, the infrastructure will collapse through lack of maintenance, and then the remaining population suffers big time

i want to note that i am not using this as an argument to support population growth. i am only stating the big, big problem that needs to be tackled somehow, concerning population loss. some big-brains are going to have to work this problem through, fast!

side note: interestingly, most NA cities are spread out and sprawled so much that they are suffering unaffordable infrastructure bills already, despite not suffering the effects of population loss. goodness knows how these places will fare when population loss actually hits...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santería

japan should takes notes from vietnam, which is following the path to this outcome, but for different reasons. taken from vietcetera:

In the Nguyễn Dynasty (1802 - 1945), people with great merit to the royal family were awarded by being given the national family name. They would have the same surname as that of the royal family members.

apparently the royal family handed this name out a bit too freely, the end result is that 40% of the population now uses one surname.

note: this data is from 2015

this chart is really enlightening to showcase to people how the uk is a "two-speed" economy, where london and south-east england basically hog all the resources, and how actually, it's (in my belief) the underlying factor for why the brexit vote went the way it did

i.e, most places in the uk are at the bottom of the pack of european cities, yet as a whole, were still expected to be the 2nd biggest contributors to the eu, and pony up funds to cities higher on this list

this inequality might be the reason some voters were very, very salty when being pleaded to vote to remain in the eu

i know in practice, the contributions are chump change when compared to national budgets, but it provided a rare source of objective, indisputable ammo that was used to nudge the needle towards leaving. it was absolute loggerheads to try and explain to anyone why i could be okay with "my taxes in birmingham being siphoned off to budapest"

(for avoidance of doubt, i voted remain)

if you mean this literally? then until the 28th of january, 2025

and before some of you pipe up and say "nuh uh, by convention elections are held on thursdays/held in summer/held whenever", like, when has this government cared about convention 😅

the conservatives have zero reason to call it early. dont be surprised if it goes all the way to the legal limit

my headcanon on this is delayed leap-day bugs from february 29th, only showing up just now

i remember playing pokerstars vr like 5 years ago. i learnt after a few days to pick a neutral avatar and mute mic. it stopped being fun real quick after that, because it ended up effectively as a 3d simulator of regular pokerstars.

haven't really done multiplayer vr since 😅

request: can we get this open collective page link included in the feddit.uk sidebar?

currently, it says: "Contribution link coming soon to a wallet near you"

nice! i am now all paid up. feels gooood 🙂

thank you both for your hard work ❤️

and absolutely, don't feel guilty at all for repaying both of your personal costs from the budget. the point of open collective is so that we can see that you are making payments within reason. in my opinion, that includes compensating yourself for the personal expenses prior to today, so that it retroactively restores the funding back to being equitable

if you could give us a rough idea of what that personal expense was, i'd appreciate that

it's the same type of non-performative speech you see when any company says "we value our customer's complaints", or "we work hard to have a diverse and inclusive team", as if by merely saying these things that it magically becomes true

ah but meta has cracked it this time; if they just say "we never sell your info" that means they don't, right?

yeah it's pretty messy

there was an original condition called "autism" which referred to the stereotypical, ""low functioning"" case where someone has intellectual disabilities and the rest

then a ""high functioning"" variant was labelled, where the intellectual disability was missing, called "asperger's syndrome"

then more and more inbetween cases started being labelled like rett syndrome, CDD, PDD-NOS, and so they had to say "fuck it, it's all "autism spectrum disorder" now"

over time, "autism" has become shorthand for ASD. to avoid confusion, the OG autism sometimes gets described as "classic autism"

honestly it's all a big mess

the issue with death penalty is that even if you have a perfect state that makes zero mistakes when applying such penalty, it can only do so in the context of a criminal offense having been committed.

but what is a criminal offense? one person's "that's a crime" is another person's "i should be free to do that"

for example, in yemen, if you are caught performing homosexual acts as a married man, you are to be stoned to death.

in principle, a capital punishment supporter should also be okay with this.

if you are one of those who has just caught yourself saying "well... i think death penalty is okay but not like that" then you have just hit my main point like a brick wall

if the decision to apply death penalty is based on one's subjective assessment of what a crime is, then that's not rational or fair

here's some homework for you - replace "death penalty" with "any penalty" and re-run my thought sequence again :)

the very act of "criminalizing" is fraught with moral issues already, so i think we should drop all death penalties until we have perfectly solved the question "what is crime?"

for further info, here's a good one (link here, clicky!)

they all have this haircut too

i will be truthful, i had lost complete confidence in the instance after seeing the crashes back in december. i had moved to using lemmy anonymously since then, to "wait and see" if i had to setup an account elsewhere.

seeing this though? full confidence restored. 👍

i am glad there is now more than one single point of failure. i hope that this adventure becomes a valuable lesson to other instances that have just one admin running everything. if you're reading this, and your instance has one admin - you need to fix that, yesterday!

once you have an OpenCollective or something like it setup, i will be able to contribute. make sure to let us know when a fresh donation link is up (because i don't trust the old ko-fi link in the sidebar)

thank you so much for your hard work. ❤️

a Catholic health care system

is this like where the doctors and nurses have to be of the religion, or does the hospital get to decide who gets treated using their own rules? or something else? can someone explain this?

either way, what the fuck?