archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/youtubepuab - originally from r/GenZhou
Fascism is a tool, it is not "inevitable" but is a historical phenomena, it comes in times of crisis as the old society transforms in the new. There will only be fascist answer once a communist movement is large enough to be a vanguard of the country. Will this fascism be in the West? No it will be in the global south. Reactionary forces within the global south have already quelled many communist rebellions, but it is inevitable that they will lose.
The DOTP within Western countries will be the last. When the imperialist countries have to face their contradictions, only then they will fall.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/sukieniko - originally from r/GenZhou
Yes but don't tell them that
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Moralxsupport - originally from r/GenZhou
It was ran by 14-20 year olds with no life experience and a creepy pedo attorney. It was bound to fall at some point - just like the USSR.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 66%
u/Lenins2ndCat - originally from r/GenZhou
Their comments were the same but their situation was different, reddit did absolutely everything it could to be nice to them and to try and keep them. Reddit has done absolutely nothing to try and build a positive relationship with the left.
If the entire population of /r/genzedong moved to /r/socialism with almost no change in moderation, /r/socialism would also be killed off by reddit because it would become an immediate threat to the status quo with its high activity level and the quality of the arguments put forwards.
None of this has anything to do with moderation choices. It is a political repression. T_D on the other hand had a belligerent modteam that was uninterested in reining in some of the problems that existed. It wasn't politically repressed in the same way, Spez is far right and I suspect a majority of the techbros in reddit are psychotic libertarian ancap age-of-consent types.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 50%
u/KeyBoardWarrior1245 - originally from r/GenZhou
I feel like I saw this same comment 3 years ago. Except replace every mention of r/GenZeDong with r/The_Donald and you’ll have the same exact comments The_Donald users were making while their subreddit was dying. Sad
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/BreadDaddyLenin - originally from r/GenZhou
DISREGARD THIS CLOWN. HE IS A DELUDED NAZBOL DUTERTE SUPPORTER
`u/Anananaso - originally from r/GenZhou` Mostly short primers or articles on what actually went down that isn't western propaganda (book recs are good too). Basically the mini-series came up in conversation the other night and everyone was talking about the disaster as if having watched TV made them a bunch of nuclear experts, extremely aggravating. I'm relatively ignorant on the subject so I'd like to learn more.
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/Anananaso (score +6)` Mostly short primers or articles on what actually went down that isn't western propaganda (book recs are good too). Basically the mini-series came up in conversation the other night and everyone was talking about the disaster as if having watched TV made them a bunch of nuclear experts, extremely aggravating. I'm relatively ignorant on the subject so I'd like to learn more.
`u/TheRealSlimLaddy - originally from r/GenZhou`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/TheRealSlimLaddy (score +6)`
`u/punhosocialista - originally from r/GenZhou`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/punhosocialista (score +12)`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Kravt3n01 - originally from r/GenZhou
I’m glad you can take strength out of your faith. Also it’s very healthy you’re aware about All of these feelings and how to cope with them. For me personally I learned to have a somewhat stable relation with keeping in touch with my political beliefs and learning to let them go to focus more on “life” in general after i went offline for a month or so. Also in general society opening up more now Made it a lot easier to proces some of the sleepless doomscrolling nights.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Chris3108 - originally from r/GenZhou
Can I have a source directly from communists in the Philippines. This could just be the government framing the opposition as having ties with the CPP NPA
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/SuspiciousMode4195 - originally from r/GenZhou
Their main publication Ang Bayan defends Robredo and promotes her. Their mass organizations are closely tied to the CPP. Their lines are nearly indistinguishable.
They have sided with US imperialism by splitting the PKP-1930. Also Sison was friends with Aquino who worked closely with the CIA before Marcos executed him.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Chris3108 - originally from r/GenZhou
They are endorsing the Liberal Party candidate Leni Robredo. Their mass organizations in BAYAN are promoting her.
That is an error but mass organizations have autonomy from the rest of the party so it might not be representative of the party itself.
They have sided with the US since 1968.
When?
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/SuspiciousMode4195 - originally from r/GenZhou
They are endorsing the Liberal Party candidate Leni Robredo. Their mass organizations in BAYAN are promoting her.
They have sided with the US since 1968.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Chris3108 - originally from r/GenZhou
When tf did the CPP side with the US.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/SuspiciousMode4195 - originally from r/GenZhou
Achieving communism is siding with the main vehicle of US imperialism in the Philippines?
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Chris3108 - originally from r/GenZhou
Cope, they are actually doing work to achieve communism unlike most groups in the world
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/SuspiciousMode4195 - originally from r/GenZhou
The Maoist clowns are losing in the Philippines.
`u/discoinfffferno - originally from r/GenZhou` [https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5v5epl/response\_to\_china\_as\_a\_socialist\_marxistleninist/](https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5v5epl/response_to_china_as_a_socialist_marxistleninist/)
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/discoinfffferno (score +1)` [https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5v5epl/response\_to\_china\_as\_a\_socialist\_marxistleninist/](https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/5v5epl/response_to_china_as_a_socialist_marxistleninist/)
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Remarkable-Unit9011 - originally from r/GenZhou
Vanguardism is attainable. Its hard to see core imperial nations make the transition but if we end up in a multi polar world, particularly one where the US is forced into terminal decline, it is attainable.
Read your theory. Understand the tactics of the guerrila. Bide your time. There is no perfect time for revolution but there is always time to prepare
`[deleted] - originally from r/GenZhou` [deleted]
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou (score +2)` [deleted]
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Chris3108 - originally from r/GenZhou
Communism is inevitable even under fascism. WHen the nazis controlled europe during ww2 there were many guerilla movements lead by communist parties and today there are communist guerillas gaining strength in places like the Philippines and India
`u/JITTERdUdE - originally from r/GenZhou` Something that’s been in my mind recently. Shit looks like it’s going to hit the fan over the next several years. Seeing how easily the population has slipped into a Russophobic rage through disinformation and propaganda shows that the seeds for fascism have already been planted here. This country’s government does everything to actively suppress communist movements and are attempting to exhaust Marxist-Leninist efforts. I have developed two reactions to this, one cynical and one more optimistic, but I struggle to tell which one is closer to reality. The cynical side of me thinks that this country has fallen too far into the deep end and can’t be saved, that communism cannot happen in a place like this, and it’s better to leave and start elsewhere than stay and possibly die at the hands of fascists. The other part of me believes that choice could be cowardly, and it is better to stay and create communist infrastructure and protect the marginalized.
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/JITTERdUdE (score +74)` Something that’s been in my mind recently. Shit looks like it’s going to hit the fan over the next several years. Seeing how easily the population has slipped into a Russophobic rage through disinformation and propaganda shows that the seeds for fascism have already been planted here. This country’s government does everything to actively suppress communist movements and are attempting to exhaust Marxist-Leninist efforts. I have developed two reactions to this, one cynical and one more optimistic, but I struggle to tell which one is closer to reality. The cynical side of me thinks that this country has fallen too far into the deep end and can’t be saved, that communism cannot happen in a place like this, and it’s better to leave and start elsewhere than stay and possibly die at the hands of fascists. The other part of me believes that choice could be cowardly, and it is better to stay and create communist infrastructure and protect the marginalized.
`u/Bacon_Is_Greasy - originally from r/GenZhou` At least in classical Marxist texts there is a focus between class divisions and the inequalities that come with those those divisions. I have been thinking about the economic differences within the working class and if those differences would cause any divisions after the revolution and into socialism. I know communism isn’t egalitarian in that we all get the same pay and things like that, I was just wondering if those differences would have us regress back into class society.
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/Bacon_Is_Greasy (score +5)` At least in classical Marxist texts there is a focus between class divisions and the inequalities that come with those those divisions. I have been thinking about the economic differences within the working class and if those differences would cause any divisions after the revolution and into socialism. I know communism isn’t egalitarian in that we all get the same pay and things like that, I was just wondering if those differences would have us regress back into class society.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/spellbanisher - originally from r/GenZhou
From the perspective of Marxist Dialectical Materialism, it is impossible in our current epoch to imagine a stateless society. The premise of dialectical materialism is that since society is constantly in flux, every epoch contains contradictions, that is, Progressive and reactionary, forces destroying the current order (or bringing about the next order) and forces sustaining it. The job of a Marxist is to identify the contradictions, then to aid the progressive forces while opposing the reactionary ones.
For example, looking at the Capitalist epoch, the Progressive forces are: abolishing feudalism, creating the proletariat, socializing production, generating enormous material wealth, and promoting cultural and social interaction. The reactionary forces are the dictatorship of capital, the creation of the bourgeoisie, the alienation of social relations, aritifical scarcity and inequality, and imperialism.
The Marxist should support the eradication of feudalism while also opposing the dictatorship of capital, back the proletariat against the bourgeoisie, oppose artificial scarcity, support cultural intercourse while fighting imperialism.
It makes no sense to discuss what Communism would look like when the world hasn't even entered the socialist epoch (or in the case of China, the higher mode of socialism). At best we can only adumbrate it.
`u/Lilyo - originally from r/GenZhou`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/Lilyo (score +0)`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou (score +1)` [removed]
`u/ich-sehe-dich-nicht - originally from r/GenZhou` I'm looking for books that can help me better understand the basic concepts behind economic planning, any suggestions? I'm looking for more recent books if possible, but really everything helps thank you guys
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/ich-sehe-dich-nicht (score +16)` I'm looking for books that can help me better understand the basic concepts behind economic planning, any suggestions? I'm looking for more recent books if possible, but really everything helps thank you guys
`u/pl4t1n00b - originally from r/GenZhou`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/pl4t1n00b (score +270)`
`u/Zeta1906 - originally from r/GenZhou`
`Originally posted on r/GenZhou by u/Zeta1906 (score +1)`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Choris - originally from r/GenZhou
The wealth of European leaders/oligarchs is connected to the US-controlled financial system. They have worked for a long time to get their hands on so much wealth, but they could lose most of it if the US chooses to sanction Europe next (or even just those leaders individually). They would have to start from nothing again, and even then, China wouldn't even allow them to hoard similar amounts of assets and power compared to what they have now.
`u/LeftConnoisseur - originally from r/GenZhou`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Niomedes - originally from r/GenZhou
Since the overwhelming majority of crimes arise from inequality, there just won't be that many. Other than that, society will absolutely maintain security forces that can handle those outliers. It's necessity for any society to have an organised defense, or else it cannot really defend itself.
`u/CorneliusSavarin - originally from r/GenZhou` I don't really understand too much of Europe's relation to America. The current situation in Ukraine is clearly not in EU's favor. They would have to deal with refugees, an angered Russian neighbor, expensive LNG from the USA, and possibly more segmented trading blocs that does not benefit them. Yet Germany just took the boot to the head like a dog. This would have been more understandable when there was no alternatives to the US in the 90s perhaps, but as of today whats stopping the EU from looking out for their own interests and working with RU or CN if thats what they need? Why so subservient? And if so, why not any moves to at least stand up for itself? The EU and the Euro is definitely in jeopardy now. Is it literally because of NATO and EU has a terrible army? Is it because they don't have any of the technological dominance and shares too much of it's cyber networks with the USA (unlike RU and CN which has their own ecosystem)? I am super confused at the lack of them even speaking up for their own interests...
`u/KiyoKei - originally from r/GenZhou` https://lemmygrad.ml/post/178267
`u/Fusion_Reborn - originally from r/GenZhou` [removed]
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/BILLCLINTONMASK - originally from r/GenZhou
Go back in time and ask a Roman Senator what "capitalist society" will look like and he'd have no idea.
I'd wager any answer you're going to get (however well informed) is not coming from a seer who can accurately describe the future.
`u/Radiant_Ad_1851 - originally from r/GenZhou` I need to get some facts straight for something coming up. So, what I remember is that Khrushchev is blamed as the catalyst for the fall of the Soviet Union(in Marxist Leninist circles) mainly because A.He reintroduced the anarchy of production when it was sorely unneeded, allowing things like the Brezhnev Stagnation to happen B.Removed the dictatorship of the proletariat, which allowed for a new class of people to own the means of production, which then incentivized the reintroduction of the capitalist system like we saw in 1991. C.The secret speech that caused some party members like Gorbachev and Yeltsin to be completely dissolutions with Communism I know this is a vast oversimplification, but is this basic line of thought correct, am I going in the complete wrong direction, or am I just forgetting a few things? Edit:Where in the hell did I get this information from?!
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/ChineseGoldenAge - originally from r/GenZhou
Couple of questions:
- How would law be maintained? Example like for crimes.
- How would robots with advanced artificial intelligences or advanced human social engineering have a place in a socialist/communist/stateless society? These robots will run the means of production right?
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/darthpoof - originally from r/GenZhou
"When, at last, it becomes the real representative of the whole of society, it renders itself unnecessary. As soon as there is no longer any social class to be held in subjection; as soon as class rule, and the individual struggle for existence based upon our present anarchy in production, with the collisions and excesses arising from these, are removed, nothing more remains to be repressed, and a special repressive force, a State, is no longer necessary. The first act by virtue of which the State really constitutes itself the representative of the whole of society — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — this is, at the same time, its last independent act as a State. State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The State is not "abolished". It dies out. This gives the measure of the value of the phrase: "a free State", both as to its justifiable use at times by agitators, and as to its ultimate scientific insufficiency; and also of the demands of the so-called anarchists for the abolition of the State out of hand."
The State is the apparatus one class uses to supress other classes; it arose from class society and likewise disappears along with class society. When there is no class society on a global scale, there is by definition no state. There is still a government and representatives etc etc, not some weird utopian/anarchist concept of "the people" directly ruling and deciding everything with some sort of impossible mass direct democracy.
`u/JITTERdUdE - originally from r/GenZhou` I’ve been wondering lately how this would work, as I know the idea is that many institutions that are governed by the state would be run entirely by the people. However, I’m wondering how this would work. How would these institutions operate without a state? What does it mean to be run by the people? How is it any different from what anarchists envision?
`u/ZhongguoGraecia - originally from r/GenZhou` If you have simple questions regarding China, Marxism, etc. that do not deserve a post you may ask them here.
`[deleted] - originally from r/GenZhou` [deleted]
`u/ThePeoplesBadger - originally from r/GenZhou` Unfortunately, my knowledge of the conflict is very limited and the US media, surprise surprise, has almost entirely ignored the war and devastation going on there. Does anyone have good resources which seek to explain the history of the conflict, the material conditions leading up to it, the material conditions during the lifetime of the conflict, and the material conditions now on the ground? All I know is that Islamic extremists (ISIS? Salafism? Wahhabism?) are involved, it seems that Syria and Russia have been working together against them, and the US is doing its "drone strike everything" military strategy. I know that people are starving, I know that entire cities have been completely destroyed, and I assume that the West is interested in ousting Assad by any means necessary. I know that absolutely awful things are going on over there and then the US and West are very involved in the horrors but are engaged in a media blackout on the realities of the conflict.
`u/MarsLowell - originally from r/GenZhou` I’ve been trying to come up with a more concise answer to why prices have risen, as opposed to just “it’s complicated”. Popular liberal narrative has been trying to simply reduce it to “printing more money bad” and thus something something we shouldn’t help the poors, but we know the more expansive reasoning behind it (strained supply chains, deprecating value of commodities, etc). I suppose the question is, where can I find good “in summary” explanations from a Marxist-Leninist perspective?
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Arch_Null - originally from r/GenZhou
They've never done that. We can see the contrary when Hitler banned all parties except the nazi party. Same jn italy. We can even see this in Ukraine where Zelensky is banning opposition parties. So this is ahistorical nonsense you are spouting.
My bad for not answering the question I was just so caught off guard by that idiotic statement of yours my friend. The goal isn't to reestablish faith in this system. Its just to buy time to fight against the inevitable. Nowhere did I say to validate the system. You are putting words in my mouth.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/thunderfart6 - originally from r/GenZhou
Liberal democracy as it exists is supported by fascists. What are you talking about? Lol. You didnt even answer my question tho.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Arch_Null - originally from r/GenZhou
fascists defend liberal democracy.
No they don't....
In fact they actively oppose it. Huh? This literally runs contrary to all examples of fascism.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/justaguy891 - originally from r/GenZhou
defend liberal democracy
im sorry, wheres the democracy? certainly not here in america
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/thunderfart6 - originally from r/GenZhou
Telling people to defend liberal democracy is a bad thing when the goal is actual democracy. Why would you instill faith in bourgeois elections when we know that cannot and will not improve the lives of anyone, but the ones at the top? Liberals and fascists defend liberal democracy, we're supposed to challenge it and show why it's bullshit with a solution.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Arch_Null - originally from r/GenZhou
Telling people to defend liberal democracy isn't a bad thing. Is fascism an inevitability for the American people? Yes, as certain as the sun rising tomorrow. But telling people to defend lib democracy will buy time for communist, union organizers, and other groups of the oppressed to organize. Build the proper institutions to counter act this threat.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/stalbox - originally from r/GenZhou
Chinese Marxist economist Minqi Li comments on unequal exchange as a result of wage differentials using the metric of “labour terms of trade,” the ratio between average labour time embodied in a given monetary quantity of exports and the same monetary quantity of imports of a country. A labour terms of trade less than 1 means that a country on average has to spend more time working to import foreign goods than foreign countries spend working to import that country’s goods. In this sense, a country with a labour terms of trade less than 1 is being exploited by foreign economies, as its workers have to work more hours than foreign workers for the same quantity of goods (i.e. its workers are underpaid relative to foreign workers).
By 2012, China had a net ‘exploiter’ in its trade with East Asian, South Asian, and African Peripheral economies… However, China’s labor terms of trade was only 0.14 against thr United Tates and 0.20 against other ‘high income economies’… China’s terms of trade against the Middle East, Eastern Europe and Latin America remained unfavourable. Overall, China continues to be a peripheral economy within the capitalist world system.
I pulled most of this from my notes on Zak Cope’s The Wealth of Some Nations so lmk if I was unclear or if you need more context. It’s been a while since I’ve read it so I don’t think I was as eloquent as I could’ve been.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/Guidobama - originally from r/GenZhou
⛏⛏⛏
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/thunderfart6 - originally from r/GenZhou
Idk they got a pretty liberal line when it comes to elections which is like the worst way to build socialism
`u/YahyaFaizan - originally from r/GenZhou`
`u/Original-Vivid - originally from r/GenZhou`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/bigman1025 - originally from r/GenZhou
What do you mean he did nothing????
`u/Revolutionary_Cat30 - originally from r/GenZhou`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/laundry_writer - originally from r/GenZhou
genetically and culturally superior to the Chinese
Isn't HK mostly Han Chinese?
`u/Jane_Is_Trans - originally from r/GenZhou`
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Arch_Null - originally from r/GenZhou
No I'm dead ass. Anyone who actually pays attention to American communist activity will tell you what I have. Like c'mon over the past 10 months their membership has grown exponentially.
This comment of yours has no material basis in reality.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
[deleted] - originally from r/GenZhou
[removed]
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Jack_ofall_Trades85 - originally from r/GenZhou
Honestly I think cpusa, psl are jokes. Only 'communist' platform i would support is the SEP/WSWS
`u/Rayiull - originally from r/GenZhou` I saw a video someone recommended here or on the other sub that explained how FIAT works, how an economically sovereign country can print relatively infinite money without repercussion, and it also explained how money got value due to taxation and a menace of violence; examples with Japan and their 200% debt to GDP ratio, UK and the head of the National Bank explaining how they could print x amount of money for the government, etc. I found the video to be really good and, shame on me, forgot to save it. Infinite amount of gratitude for the one that shares the video with me and the sub.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/Arch_Null - originally from r/GenZhou
A was under that impression like 2 years ago but nah the CPUSA is a marxist leninist organization. The Joe and Rosana era of the cpusa is doing pretty good for the party.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 100%
u/MichaelLanne - originally from r/GenZhou
Obviously the Germany ,if I was in Europe at this time is the bigger threat.
I’ll remind you that the Marxist-Leninist were the first ones who resisted against Nazism in the occupied territories contrary to the bourgeoisie, the liberals, the social-democrats, the anarchists and the Trotskyites who mades the choice of defeat.
This doesn’t mean that they weren’t aware of Anglo Imperialism : they just know their priorities.
archive_bot 2 years ago • 0%
u/randomassname0120 - originally from r/GenZhou
The West were also imperialists. In the fight between imperialists and imperialists, the question is do you support one or remain neutral?
`u/Unclerickythemaoist - originally from r/GenZhou` Which “communist” parties in the United States are Liberal