RGB 1 year ago • 100%
It's not even monospace
RGB 1 year ago • 0%
Why not surface communities based on activity. As in how active the comments section is. That way agreements and disagreements are weighed equally.
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
This can also go the same way for upvotes. If you have to put some thought into a disagreement you should do the same for agreement. So upvotes should be removed too so the platform just operates on voiced agreement or disagreement in the comments.
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
p2p makes sense in this situation. It can end up being a massive battery drainer if we are talking smartphone implementation. (coming from torrenting reference point and how it eats battery on phones)
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
I can already imagine a few ways that can go wrong. This would be a awesome way to do it though but there are many issues that would have to be addressed for that.
RGB 1 year ago • 80%
The good thing is you can always run a tiny instance for just yourself and not defederate with anyone if other communities defederate too aggressively.
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
Pulling a YouTube over here I guess.
RGB 1 year ago • 95%
defederation should be kept to a minimum and saved for big offenders only. I think best option is for lemmy to have an option to hide posts from some instances on a per user basis.
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
Reporting isn't good. I do think users should have an ability to block instances for themselves. (you can do that right now if you run your own instance)
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
It's more open and not locked down to proprietary software.
I 3d printed a scan of [this](https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/hraschina-meteorite-nhmw-min-a2-52bbf1933af444d4adb2478d1bfafe0f) meteorite in thermal PLA
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
I'm seeing the same thing. Good question
RGB 1 year ago • 100%
I'm just chilling and getting comfy. then I'll start contributing after I feel out the vibe here.