Thank you for the good advice! I just talked to him over my lunch, I didn't bring up feeling disappointed, but I asked if he'd be willing to try to do some fun activities over our 4-day weekend. I was an expecting a "yeah, sure" but he's actually really excited about it. I'm going to be planning one or two small things each day, dinner at our favorite restaurant being one of them. I'm also picking some activities that are easy to cancel last minute should he be in too much pain (oh I should plan at home things we can do if that happens, like renting his favorite movie). Thank you again for encouraging me to say something, I have a hard time planning, but he's worth it.

I do want to go, but I don't want him to suffer for it, it's not worth that. I'd rather cancel to make him comfortable. For me it's more about doing something special to celebrate the milestone, it feels like our first big anniversary being the 5th, but that's probably just me holding on to some weird tradition. I'm thinking about making a nice dinner with him (or maybe for him if he's still in pain). He's always been the planner in our relationship, so I really want to do something for him to show him that I appreciate him.

I would totally reschedule if we could, but it's too late to take back the days off we scheduled. Maybe we'll reschedule way later, but I can't this month since we're taking time off for all the dental work aswell. I feel bad for him being in so much pain, tooth aches really do suck. In the past we would make a nice dinner together (we couldn't afford anything crazy as college students lol), maybe I can ask him to do that this weekend. We always talked about going to this flower garden nearby, or kayaking on the river, maybe I should bring some of these up to him. I was worried I was asking too much to want to do more, but talking to him sounds like a good idea, maybe he'll have some more ideas of his own. Thank you for validating my disappointment, even if it is only minor disappointment.

"Oh, just my mother and father and uncle sitting around, talking. It's like being a pedestrian, only rarer." - Clarisse McClellan

Proper animal testing

I pictured a landline in the shape of a lobster, beauty that can never be obtained.

edit; OMG It's real!

This is true for democratic nations, but they've been feeling the hurt lately as representatives are being bought out by (you guessed it) billionaires. So even when it's the governments failing, it's usually some rich asshole pulling the strings behind them. Who would've thought a corrupt politician would need a sugar daddy.

Oh shit thank you for reminding me. This idea that it's our individual responsibility to prevent climate change rather than our largest producers/manufactures was a goddamn marketing ploy in the 1920s. It was spear headed by disposable companies like Dixie as people were getting more upset about littering, the public thought companies making one use items was incredibly wasteful and the reason for an abundance of litter in city areas. With the companies PR efforts, they were able to convince the general public that it's not the producers of the litter that cause the problem, but the people who use it. We had a chance to kill the disposable industry and we missed it, I hope it comes back around some day.

unfortunately; yes.

I KNOW LIKE A SEA OF GRASS

That's actually what my needy Kentucky bluegrass lawn looks like right now lol, most prairie grass lawns in my area are more drought resistant than the "virgin lawns."

just adding to this cause I found a good picture, really want to get a fine fescue & pollinator mix alone the fine fescue is nice, but the bee pack has super cute flowers

Hello! You have fallen into the tolerance paradox; how can you be tolerant when you're intolerant to intolerance? Easy I'm tolerant because I don't tolerate intolerance. Beliefs aren't equal, anyone who believes in inferiority or inequal treatment for reasons outside ones control should be called out. It is not a live and let live mindset, it's a "live the way I tell you to or you're a bigot" doesn't sound very liberty loving to me. You can dislike it, you can rant, but once you limit peoples access to equal rights and treatment you're infringing on their rights. Any freedom loving American can respect that.

I'll admit I've used it for similar reasons. What I really should be saying is "I'm sorry, but I don't want to talk about this right now." Maybe I'll even be brave and say "I don't want to talk about this with you." but it's rare for me to find a person I don't want to hear at all from. That usually comes up because they've already made their arguments, and I've already accepted or rebuttal the points to my own satisfaction. At that point they'll talk themselves into circles looking for justification for parts of their stance, but unable to articulate it themselves. I'll listen to anyone's views at least once, given I'm in the right mindset, but I still wouldn't date someone I don't morally agree with. Life partners should have higher standards than conversation partners, and aligning values is a bare minimum for relationships.

Why are you all the way down here by yourself, we gotta move this comment up, and thank you!

Yes, other space debris.

Oh no how dare you remind me lol. Wolf's Rain here's episode 1 https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x82c7kc the theme SLAPS but the whole things lowkey furry bait. still good, kinda wanna watch it again.

This isn't like awful, but it's noticeable. Full Metal Alchemist (brotherhood? I forget who came first) we started great and strong, good pacing, but then they ran out of source material too quickly. SO, they started making it up as they went. I stopped when the general planning a coupe flips to a genocidal maniac, the character shift was so jarring. Apparently further down this path they lose their alchemist abilities and get shot to WWII to fight some Nazis. It was so off the rails, when the manga started up again they completely redid the anime from the beginning. I love this anime, but I have to make a guide on how to watch it every time I suggest it. The second attempt didn't do as well with the early episodes like the first one did, probably because they were trying to catch up. Wild ride, still worth it.

I'mma do it, I'mma be the one to bring up Undertale this time (estimated 2 hours, worth a few replays), there's also little nightmares (2-4 hours depending on platforming skills) which is a spooky little game, but not too spooky if you ever play in front of the kids.

Google catio, it will please you whether you're here for the birds or the cats.

Thanks for the warning, but I don't mind different; different can be good. I'm excited to see the beginnings of my childhood game, I think it'll be worth the patience. Though, having a hard time finding it, it's not on the blizzard downloads list. I'mma do more digging tho, it's gotta be out there somewhere.

Yes, there was an odd vibe here I couldn't pin down, I think you found it.

I think now is a good time for a friendly reminder; political left & right can vary drastically by nation, they can be similar but don't expect labels to line up perfectly (confederative is a good example of a changing definition across nations). When it comes to the tone of the article though, I think you hit the nail on the head. In my experience, the BBC has some bias when reporting on other nations, especially if they were once a British colony (seriously yikes). I'm not surprised they're doing a little French bashing, it's kind of an old habit for the British lol.

You know, I never tried Diablo 1 even though I grew up religiously playing Diablo 2. Also love the original fallout games, I definitely need to make time for this.

I've said it before, but the French know how to rebel, they're very good at it. Every time the government oversteps, they're on the streets calling them out, it's really impressive actually.

I've always enjoyed left 4 dead as a casual co-op, and Back 4 Blood is a great revamp of the originals. Idk about others, but I've always had a hard time getting competitive in these games. Though if you want a little friendly competition, versus still exists with a lot of fun new special zombies.

This is my stance on it too. People like to treat today's political environment as two sides of a coin diametrically opposed, but that's not how political ideology works, it's more nuance than that, like a sphere. I get why American's do it with a two-party system, but that doesn't mean you're all in on one or another, people are more nuance than that too. People who run with this mentality that there are only two sides to politics often fall into the mistake of equating to two as equal sides as you said. It makes it hard to acknowledge the difference of the extremes and their intentions.

Though I think the biggest reason people are less tolerant the alt right is because there are more reasons outside of politics to be against the alt right. Outside of politics, alt lefties usually get into arguments with economist and capitalist because extreme leftist have intensions to change the economic landscape. Whether for better or worse is precisely what they're arguing about. There's also the more fringe alt left (tankies I believe) who will get in a tussle with historians and survivors alike, but their conversations chill out once they realize no one's condoning anything (usually, idk all you tankies).

Meanwhile the alt right targets specific freedoms enshrined by the US constitution and the Human Bill of Rights. The alt right wants a say in who you marry, whether or not you should adopt, religious rule you should abide by, who should/shouldn't get to vote, whether the vote should be decided by the people or legislator (you now Democracy and all), your identity, your medical decisions, your family planning, your education, and the very books you read. There's a desire to snub out individuality if it doesn't abide by the alt rights idea of "normal." All of these stances directly invade individual rights of many people and their ability to pursue their respective happiness. While there's political reasons to speak out against these stances, there's also moral obligation and the simple instinct of survival pushing back on these perspectives. This creates a large group of people who not only disagree, but whose existence is literally threaten, there's no room for tolerance when lives and freedom are on the line. The reason alt right has a tough time is because most Americans still hold age-old American values of liberty, life, and the pursuit of happiness.

Fallout: New Vegas. Wait now, don't laugh at me. I'm painfully aware it was built on an engine that just does not cooperate and crashes regularly. BUT, the gameplay itself, the roleplaying, the fights (yes I do like VATS), and the choices by god the choices. So many choices with so many consequences, telltale wishes they were this cool. The only thing for me that's holding this game back is 1) the rickety engine it's attempting to balance on, and 2) unfinished quest lines. The devs for this game had so many brilliant ideas that never made it on screen, I don't know if they shot themselves in the foot, or if the deadlines were unrealistic. Even though some of the main quests between the warring factions feel lopsided, and some interesting things seem to go to a dead-end, the game never felt unfinished to me. There was so much to do and try, I never felt cheated by the game in narrative. Instead, I just want more because it was awesome how interactive the world was. It responded to my decisions and made a unique playthrough because of my decisions, I don't believe the predecessors even come close to this. Sure 3 and 4 kept similar mechanics, but the game didn't react to your choices. If I had one wish it would be to see Fallout New Vegas as the devs intended, with every plot line completed and polished, I'd even continue to play it on its rickety system. Though this would need to be a magical wish because there's no way that engine could handle the work needed, and converting this content to a new engine would be very expensive (so I'm told). I know she's not perfect, but goddamn she has the potential to be.

You know what, yes. I think I will do that, idc if I'm complaining to a void anymore, its unhealthy to keep all the rage inside. Better to plan civil disobedience than get swept up into a riot from it. At least all of these comments make my rage feel valid.

I'm full of rage, the law means nothing we have no rights, fuck the courts, any petty revenge I can pull to get some type of catharsis I will until the loans are paid off; so for the rest of my life. If anyone has any play to be of mild annoyance, let me know I have one purpose and it's to fuck shit up.

Speaking of app developers, has anyone heard anything about a Beehaw app? I haven't seen it brought up yet

AWOO BROTHER

Dang man I'd feel bad too in those conditions lol. It's only when I'm not sure what caused it that I absolve myself, or bunnies, can't stop the bunnies.

Yes, mostly when it's in a pot in my house. Outside plants are at the mercy of the world, plants inside are at the mercy of me. If it dies in here, its dying under my care and protection. If it dies out there, it faced the elements and lost in spite of my efforts.

I only have a title to add to this "I have no mouth and I must scream"

Technically written (or at least influenced) by a women Liberty by John Stuart Mill talks about the importance of freedom, individuality, and a willingness to confront new and old ideas, especially if they challenge your mindset. While it's attributed to John Stuart Mill, John himself is adamant that none of these ideas would've come to fruition without his wife's involvement. He dedicated Liberty to his wife, who passed shortly before it was completed.

John says "Like all that I have written for many years, it belongs as much to her as to me; but the work as it stands has had, in a very insufficient degree, the inestimable advantage of her revision; some of the most important portions having been reserved for a more careful re-examination, which they are now never destined to receive. Were I but capable of interpreting to the world one-half the great thoughts and noble feelings which are buried in her grave, I should be the medium of a greater benefit to it than is ever likely to arise from anything that I can write, unprompted and unassisted by her all but unrivalled wisdom." Historians have tried to downplay his wife's involvement, writing up John's descriptions as biased and blinded by love. But I believe his admiration for her wit was the reason for that love based on how he talks about her. This book was also published in 1859, a period where women were not well represented in literature, a published women was almost unheard of.

There's another book he published later in life that was co written by his daughter called the "The Subjection of Women." I haven't read it myself, but it's a foundational text for feminist ideology. This one was published in 1869 and historians are more willing to contribute some of the work to his daughter. Hope you like them!

Hold on I'm a fool, the more I think about your point of context the more I realize I missed the point. There's no indication this is normalizing the language, but rather a mockery or a parody of the language and by extension the ideology of a "master race" in general. Which is honestly a great way to combat racist ideology, apply them to some inconsequential to display its absurdity.

The only real challenge, and what I think needs to be considered, is the same thing you mentioned in your second comment; failure to recognize the joke is on ideology not in support. So, the responsibility comes in recognizing when the context shifts to support for these values and shutting that down or separating yourself accordingly. If the community is able to uphold it's parody without lending support it may be beneficial to continue using these terms only to turn the language itself into a joke. Thanks @joba2ca@feddit.de I wouldn't have gotten here without your solid points. I'm leaving my above responses so people can see how I walk through this reasoning, but I wanted to be sure you saw that your points reached me and made a difference. Thanks again.

I understand people mean it as a meme or a joke, I guess I question whether or not it excuses the use. Saying "It's just a joke" is a common response to things like this, but if the outcome is still the same does it matter if it's a joke? While context matters to understand intent, does that intent address the consequence of normalizing this language? Or does it just excuse normalizing the language? I appreciate jokes just as much as the next person, but there's still a matter of responsibility when joking. To me it's the same as pranking someone, you have to be considerate for a prank to go well, and saying "it's just a prank" doesn't excuse the outcome. I understand other people don't want to take language seriously when their joking, but that doesn't make their joking harmless.

So they say the meat is 99% chicken cell, does anyone know what the 1% is? I'd just feel better knowing.

Thank you for bringing up the other terminology issues, it really shows this is a bigger question than just one concerned person on the internet. I think it's good to question these terms so that the language may develop with greater intention and awareness. I noticed there is a knee jerk reaction to saying this is no big deal, but I think it would do us good to ask why we're so quick to excuse language that originates from racist ideals. Things likes discrimination and genocide all start with language, so why do we avoid the responsibility of moving away from these ideas? Just some food for thought.

How dare you make me choose . . . Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy, the ultimate edition (technically one book right?)