Sidebar

Wikimedia

"Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearWI
Wikimedia ray 10 months ago 100%
Fine-tuned LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less with Few-Shot Sequence-to-Sequence Semantic Parsing over Wikidata https://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.14202.pdf
2
0
"Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearWI
Wikimedia koavf 1 year ago 100%
Russia has launched its own version of Wikipedia, called Ruwiki, which is notably more sympathetic to Putin https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-has-launched-its-own-version-of-wikipedia-called-ruwiki-which-is-notably-more-sympathetic-to-putin/ar-AA1dOchT

A Kremlin-compliant version of Wikipedia, Ruwiki, has launched in Russia. Its founder, a former longtime editor at Russian Wikipedia, says it will follow strict Russian media laws. It's currently remarkably quiet on the Ukraine war, Prigozhin's mutiny, and criticism of Putin.

1
0
"Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearWI
Wikimedia leanleft 3 years ago 100%
awesome-wikipedia github.com

awesome list

4
0
"Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearWI
Wikimedia SnowC0de 4 years ago 100%
How can we fix Wikipedia?

I LOVE Wikipedia, I think it's one of the best websites of the internet. But the fact is that Wikipedia has many flaws: * Editing became very hard on Wikipedia based on the amount of rules to respect * Wikipedia is biased, many cultures and minorities are not well represented among editors and pages. * Wikipedia is a dependence, I can't imagine Wikipedia disappear, I think it already changed the way people see knowledge, not as something fixed anymore, but as something dynamic that changes and evolve. * Wikipedia 'sources admission' are also very... Weird. Because you can be a professional in a special field, it doesn't mean your contribution will be accepted, just because your source is not coming from a 'reliable source', even if YOU are this reliable source. There are other problems as well, but I think those are the most important ones. What do you think about it? If you could change anything or everything to Wikipedia, what would you do?

7
1